Crikey this will help too!: “Flint Global's co-founder, Ed Richards, has direct experience with ITV, having worked as the CEO of Ofcom, the UK's media regulator”
“Dana Strong, the American chief executive of Sky, hopes to convince UK competition regulators that times have changed — that Britain’s broadcasters are no longer in competition with each other, but rather America’s tech giants. To make that point for her, Strong has brought in a Westminster heavyweight to help her fight this regulatory scrap: James Purnell, a former Labour minister and BBC executive, and his lobbying outfit Flint Global.”
Good article on regulation today (found by Huckers @ ADVFN)
Approval seems to hinge on seeing the total ad market as “video” (eg inc YouTube) rather than just TV. The world has changed since the last time the CMA looked into ITV and it seems some there acknowledge this now…
People will say this is wishful thinking - but simply the reveal of Comcast’s intention could trigger others to act.
There are plenty of examples of this with other investments and literally with Sky - when Comcast caused Disney to compete in an auction, driving up the price. Google “comcast disney sky” for some interesting reading!
And as for ITV well Liberty originally bought ITV to partly block BSkyB or NTL from taking over ITV.
So as I say - literally anything could happen here.
How about this crazy idea - Liberty buy back their 5% stake to try and block Comcast!
Let’s read the Liberty RNS again:
“The Seller has undertaken to the Banks (as defined below) not to sell further shares in the Company for the period of 60 calendar days following the completion of the Placing, subject to certain customary exceptions.”
Winstanley - £1.6bn for Broadcast and £3.3bn for Studios total £4.9bn divided by 3.75bn shares comes to 130p so you might be spot on if this plays out as we all hope!!!
Is literally anyone selling now? Sentiment has shifted monumentally this week. A short squeeze could help a lot here too…
“Should ITV offload its broadcaster, it would still be left with a content production business expected to make £330mn of operating profit this year, according to Bank of America. At a multiple of 10 times — below recent transactions in the sector — that alone would be worth £3.3bn.”
ITV’s kitchen sink drama may yet have a happy ending
Wow this article is worth a read - goes far beyond the much repeated comments.
“Sir Peter Bazalgette, ITV’s former chairman, summed it up perfectly: “Regulators have to redefine what the advertising market actually is—Google and Meta are the real rivals now, not just TV networks.” That shift in thinking might get the deal approved, but it’ll take at least nine to twelve months of scrutiny from Ofcom and the Competition and Markets Authority, likely with strings attached.”
Always nice to read AJ Bell’s no nonsense opinions!
“Dan Coatsworth at AJ Bell said the broadcaster may finally have found a buyer for “the ball and chain” part of its business, the slower-growth media arm, which includes free-to-air channels and streaming platform ITVX, which would leave the pureplay content production business of ITV Studios.
It will become "an instant takeover target" itself, said Coatsworth, suggesting Netflix Inc (NASDAQ:NFLX) would be a potential buyer to obtain a rich library of content to feed its platform.”
I guess that would be the ultimate scenario for shareholders, first a sale of broadcast potentially including payment of a special dividend from some of the proceeds and then while we’re still counting that - the bit we are left with gets a takeover approach! Yeah I’m going to put this outcome on my wish list…!
The 70% figure is being mentioned a lot - but in situations like this companies often negotiate with the authorities eg around divestment of subsidiaries - so actions can be taken to smooth the approval.