Member Info for Bigears1170

My mistake , ASOS muddle on with just their PLC Bod of which there are seven heads - for some reason we have a PLC bod, and operational bod and an international advisory bod which cumulatively have nine heads with four advisors giving a total of thirteen heads ...... whichever way you look at it there is no justification for it ..... unnecessarily top heavy with one more snout in the trough .......|o:

Takes us up to ten bod members with three advisors thrown in for good measure - just what we were screaming out for....he can sit in between James Sutcliffe and Patsy Baker on the big table .....

ASOS daily revenues exceed our entire tin pot annual income ....it boggles the mind as to how they struggle by with just the seven on the bod ....(o:

Has the whiff of a placing imo ...... |o:

Did your news arrive ......?

SL Ferry was four months from MOU to contract ....... that’s when we knew sweet diddly about the ferry industry.....(o:

You’ve got the wrong end of the bat mate - 400k pax = 400,000 embarking passengers per year ...../o:

And it’s not my EA airport as I don’t have an opinion - I’m merely quoting what Fowler last publicly referenced in relation to his EA airport pax ..........

Mike - I know it was 400k pax as I have it in an email from Fowler ....... JscottD enquired about value of EA and was told the company had never noted its value , they mentioned the pax of the EA airport they were referencing in 2013 which provides something a steer on value ...... I have no idea or opinion on what airport they are now referring to ........

Are quoting total pax from your link ? it would be embarking international passenger only ...... as I understand it ... |o:

EA was 400k pax in 2013

FAFT only became of interest to the bb post sanctions due to a piece in the WSJ in September ;-

“five European central banks have indicated they would consider opening direct payment channels with the Central Bank of Iran to enable financial ties in the face of U.S. secondary sanctions—but fully implementing the FATF action plan is a pre condition “

The underlying problem with this is that the Europeans , much like Fowler have proven themselves to be ....thus far ........all talk...........|o:

What we were told in May was correct , as no one gave a rats ass about FAFT before sanctions as the German cooperative banks would have been clearing our Iranian transactions, hence the appearance of Westminster Sicherheit, who would have wired our lolly to the nice man at HSBC Banbury......not any more /o:

It’s also of significance to those who subscribe to the notion that the EU are secretly negotiating on the part of the US as a face saving operation - as conforming with FAFT would bring Iran in to strict compliance with western safeguards to police both money laundering and the financing of terrorist groups........ both of which are of concern to the USA ...... |o:

Why does the company deserve any credit for growth at Lungi ?

(o:

“we will update the market on material developments as appropriate and in accordance with our regulatory responsibilities.”

http://www.airports.com.na/news/65/nac-and-nampol-signs-airport-security-services-mou/

Evidently not material enough........ (o:

I recall you commenting earlier this month that you found Reuter’s to be a selective source of news ....... (o: ...........................
serious question.... are you just being ironic by quoting www.aawsat.com & www.urdupoint.com .....(o:

Rec’d post and a green thumb from me ....... I’d have thought that worthy of at least 12 thumbs ......(o:

What’s that got to do with the price of jam ?

“Rebuttal” noun - A statement which says something is not true

“When two or more people debate, one of them makes an argument, and the other follows with a rebuttal, which, plainly put, is the "no, you're wrong and this is why" argument.

We often associate rebuttals with arguments made in the courtroom or public debates that occur around election time, but the word can really apply to any situation in which an argument is put forth and someone disagrees, and explains why “ ............

Let’s suppose the SPV plays out ............France and Germany give it the green light for the sale of everything from Crude Oil to Anusol ... closely followed by a highly unlikely chain of events whereby ;

1] Fowler’s broker sources his two or three insurance companies to include reinsurance companies in the airside market place, with zero banking or underwriting ties to the US ...

2] We somehow source opex financing from a vehicle with zero banking ties to the US who are happy to provide funds....

3] As a significant shareholder, Canaccord Genuity Group Inc with offices in New York, Boston, Minneapolis,Nashville,San Francisco & Washington remain on board ,silently watching Fowler proceed with the contract, thus exposing themselves to untold US retribution...

4] We somehow manage to avoid any interface with Iran’s second largest ( sanctioned ) carrier whilst going about our business....

5] And the US decide to turn a blind eye to our US dollar transactions with IATA / SL ........................

Question ............ Which UK / EU bank will be facilitating our ongoing financial transactions with the SPV ,thus accommodating and repatriating our freshly rinsed and radioactive Iranian contract earnings whilst cocking a snook to the US ...........?

Note :-
To all posters , please feel free to offer a robust rebuttal of any of the afore mentioned points (o:

I furnished you with the source , can’t be ar$ed to post the link - google “ reuters useless humanitarian iranian SPV “ , it pops up the top of my page |o:

Fowler implies that these issues are by no means beyond our control as we’ve been told on several occasions now that we’re not dependent or reliant upon this SPV ....... and that our services are not sanctionable ....... yet we have his contradiction of....... “remaining hopeful that measures being put in place to protect EU companies against US extraterritorial actions would allow these projects to proceed.”

amongst those measures.......

The Blocking Statute - so useful not a single company stepped forward to use it ...

EIB funding - Iran being added to the list of countries eligible for EIB funding is complete farce as that vehicle is both incapable of lending due to its own regulatory compliance rules and is hamstrung by the threat of OFAC reprisal...

The SPV - the vehicle to facilitate the sale of Oil ,Gas and general commerce has evaporated to the point that its being openly touted as a reinforcement mechanism to assist with the sale of UNSANCTIONED humanitarian products ...

As an addition to the afore mentioned I recall being lectured by resident tub thumpers on how SWIFT would be telling Trump to f@#k off , that would be the same SWIFT based in Brussels,the independent non political cooperative governed under E.U. law ....... which did exactly what is was told by the US and cut off 50 odd Iranian banks from its network...

Lest we forget the indomitable ICJ , they ordered the US to lift restrictive sanctions - Trump responded by sticking two fingers up and telling em to go and spin ...........

Imo the E.U. have demonstrated themselves to be a waste of space in the face of US sanctions , simply running the clock down on Trumps tenure in a face saving operation .......... and Fowler’s hope that the E.U. measures would do the trick has proven to be misplaced ........ so why doesn’t he outline his alternative reality in which we’re not reliant upon any of the remedies contained within the SPV ............??????

He can’t which makes his assertion that we have the “ majority “ of issues addressed being as per usual ,disingenuous and deliberately misleading ..........|o:

Ps

Disappointing to see PF had no had new Keyguard contracts to share with us ....... )o:

At £14.00 pr hr those one man and his dog building site contracts all add up ........

Another cobblers Fowler update - why mention the SPV when we purportedly don’t need it ? .........according to the line he trotted out to Mike back in October ..........

“Dear Michael , We are not dependant or relying on the SPV although it will make life easier for us.”

Utter cr@p IMO ..............