RE: Results21 Nov 2021 15:31
Snowking,
The big boys are only interested in grades above 1%, not 0.50% so lets not start posting that we can lower the cut off grade to increase the resource estimate and the mines NPV because it simply isn't true in practice. It would take twice as long unless you doubled your plant and machinery capacity which would come at a significant cost which would have to be outlaid early in the development programme which in turn significantly impacts NPV. 0.50% grades may be viable at current Lithium prices but what we currently have is a spike. The big market players will be using a much lower price when undertaking forecasting to determine the price they want to pay for Zulu.
You also said 'drilling through many metres of lithium , slows the drilling compared to no lithium'. PREM are using diamond cutting so the difference won't be material in practice.
I am still both hopeful and confident the samples, the results of which you said will be received by the end of this week, will provide grades above 1%.
GR needs to provide clarification in the next RNS on what the testing approach is going forward. In London he told us why LIBS was so great and the calibration approach being adopted with known verified samples etc. He needs to tell us if he has moved away from this approach.
The next RNS needs to be a big one and ensure there is no ambiguity. Unfortunately the only RNSs GR has managed to be clear in have been the ones related to placings. I am in support of a placing if the company needs cash to keep the DFS running, even if it means raising at a discount to current SP. I would estimate the drilling programme is costing about £50k per week at the moment so £1m should keep us drilling for another 10 weeks whilst also providing a chunk of cash to progress the on site testing using LIBS, if indeed the company is going to use LIBS going forward.
Bickmaster