Member Info for Bfdinvestor

Personally I wouldn't compare BOO performance with FTSE 100 or AIM as little in common with companies on either index

I agree with you on Aim generically, but the 100 does contain some other significant businesses, look at Jet2 as an example.

However, when a troll specifically tries to use the FTSE 100 as another stick to beat Boo with, it is only right to correct the post

Hexam

Coming out and communicating that way isn't what they have done ever. So why would they change now? I'm not saying I think it is correct, as I don't, I just don't think a lack of communication necessarily signifies anything.

All they have said by way of guidance is that they expect capex to drop and they should positive FCF. Its so woolly that there is basically nothing to report against either good or bad.

It's why they should have stuck with quarterly sales updates imo

We are going to have to wait for the half year to get a business update, which isn't that far away now

I reckon first plant will arrive middle to end of next week

Spidey, it may surprise you but Boo isn't part of the FTSE 100, so why compare it to that. Other than to troll pointlessly

It is part of the AIM 100, which had a small rise yesterday after two consecutive days of falls.

Compare like for like Spidey

Still not said why you post here have you?

Shorting?

And the AIM 100 is down again today Spidey.

Still keep on trolling where you have no investment

Spidey you are clueless. The AIM 100, which Boo is part of, was up 1% yesterday, after two consecutive daily falls.

Still won't say why you only post on this board?

LD why would i be having a go at Hexam, he hasn't said anything about me today.

I actually agree with his position on Frasers, as i've just posted on another thread

BOD's are usually quite recpetive to investor calls especailly so called growth companies like GST but I have not seen that at all.

Chaebol that one sentence says it all. You would like the GST board to tell you things that have not been in RNS.

That, ofcourse, would be illegal

All we know for certain is that Frasers have a plan which will become clear with hindsight, or that is what the Frasers CEO has said.

None of us know what Ashley is thinking. Maybe he sees a parallel with where Sports Direct were a few years. A share price destroyed, media villifying him personally and the business seemingly having no real future. Sound familiar?

Fast forward to 2025 and where is Sports Direct now. Maybe he sees the same long term opportunity here. Whatever he is planning, with the scale of his purchase, it definitely isn't short term imo.

I don't think he is planning a purchase of BOO. Fraser's have never gone for a purchase of anything near that scale. I think it is more about Debenhams on one hand and becoming the perceived king of retail on the other. Debenhams could easily go back into bricks and mortar with Frasers know how as a minority partner. With signifcant stakes in the Uk's two biggest online retailers and his physical presence, he would become the king of retail

Why are you here spidey?

Spidey you must be the only supposed landlord who can't even spell "tenant"

Southcoast i bought a few WIZZ shares a couple of days ago and was surprised to see daytroll is now posting on there.

He has apparently achieved a miracle, he's telling people he's not bothered about the drop as apparently he is on a free carry on a share that has traded in a 60% range in the last year.

That is a troll for you i guess

In that case I look forward to the comedy show continuing Chaebol.

But atleast try and post something remotely accurate or relevant

Chaebol I don't think anybody cares about your views, as all you have done since you started posting here is embarrass yourself

That's the fifth time you have posted the same one sided view Chaebol

It's fairly pointless.

What form of business insurance do you know that pays out without proof of liability. I'd love to have some.

100% of LIminal customers working normally, is that so difficult to grasp for you

I'm more than happy to post both sides versions Chaebol

You, on the other hand, have only posted one side and have now posted it atleast four times I think.

What part about 100% of LIminal customers being 100% uncompromised don't you get.

Don't you think if any customers of any other exchanges had lost money it could be kept quiet

Absolute fool

And there you go again Chaebol posting complete BS about mobs.

LIminal have already stated that all of their client accounts are working normally and none have been compromised. I'll make it simple for you Chaebol as you seem too thick to understand

100% of LIminal clients, including GST, are 100% secure.

What you are posting is libellous and defamatory Chaebol

Chaebol I've said nothing of the sort. You implied Liminal were some sort of "mob" and I said you were posting BS.

LIminal have already stated, as I posted before, that NONE of their clients infrastructure has been compromised and it is al working fine. So why are you trying to imply that GS20 may not be.

Is it yet one more example of your incredible research.

It's not the first exchange that has been robbed Chaebol and sadly it probably won't be the last.

LIminal state that all their clients infrastructure is working just fine and isn't compromised in any way.

The simple fact that they have been looking at this apparently for over a year would imply that there is no immediate need for cash, despite the protestation of our resident uninvested troll to the contrary. As I've posted many times I've never understood why they continue to pay interest on the totality of debt they patently don't need

And let's not forget that, at the moment, this is all unsubstantiated rumour trying to be prolonged on here by an uninvested troll.

The Telegraph article is a simple rehash of Drapers supposed exclusive, which is ofcourse unsubstantiated