Member Info for Bfdinvestor

When you say it has tidied up the board, you simply mean that mob rule has succeeded in removing one of the few dissenting voices from challenging the lies, abuse and spite posted by a whole bunch of people who largely have no investment here.

I can't remember you saying that at all

I do remember you saying suspension was "nailed on" last Friday.

Simpl because you don't even understand the regulatory framework

Your position is none of my business, yet you make up mine on a daily basis southcoast

Liar and hypocrite as well

Oh dear this is getting desperately sad.

First admin isnt likely

Secondly how would ASOS beat someone with much deeper pockets lol.

If admin was so certain southcoast, why haven't you sold.

Maybe it's as "nailed on" as suspension was by last Friday.

This has really become a full time job for you, you must be desperate for the CFD money

Yet you still don't sell

Comical.

The loan I believe was actually made around 2007/8.

So Kamani apparently waited fifteen years before risking going to jail for what for him is a pittance.

Strange the Telegraph have buried the story

They have already replied to actual investors, myself included, that that will adhere to the regulatory tiemscales

Well they are certainly busy this morning Neil

I hope you have filters the likes of Crawshaw

Absolutely nothing of any use to add

I'll drop her a line when I've got the time

The above is what I actually posted southcoast

It seems you will lie about absolutely anything just to try to drown anything remotely positive

Kachrafilter thanks for sharing this

It kind of backs up what a very few of us have been saying about the reason for the delay.

I'll drop her a line when I've got the time

Southcoast you seem to forget that Frasers have made no allegations.

They have simply repeated the Telegraph article. An article which is nowhere to be found on the Telegraph website.

You could almost think it was planned

Actually southcoast it seems I wasn't correcting your latest lie as that is in the post below lol

Nope southcoast, just trying to add constructively to the debate. And to correct the latest lies you told, both about me and the business

Southcoast when you say they admitted the loan, they stated it was pre IPO. Which the Telegraph also confirmed. So genuinely no issue to shareholders.

As I said Hexam it's a complex issue. Writing a holding statement would be a pointless exercise.

They issued a holding statement on the 24th October in response to Frasers letter on the 23rd October, which was appropriate

The response to Frasers issued on the 25th October had actually had the best part of a week to be prepared

Kachrafilter

Yes directors can be sued personally if they deliberately withhold material information. Duty of disclosure is one of the key responsibilities of a board member

I'd guess proving it would be the issue

I guess that is why you work in finance not Comms Hexam

They did Hexam, but if you read the RNS you will see that it is simply a holding statement.

This is a far more complex issue that has come from left field

Wow not yet 9am and a sea of green plus the usual fantasy nonsense from southcoast.

Atleast kachrafilter is trying to have a serious debate.

Kachrafilter as posted yesterday I wasn't expecting an RNS today, simple because anything involving lawyers seems to take days not hours

How surprising to see a green box appearing in literally seconds, presumably to defend it's buddy.

So Nate D has two posts in the last 7 months, both here today, where he happily states he has no investment.

It's beyond funny

Maybe go and check Kodal Minerals last financials

They have millions in cash and aren't borrowing off anybody

You are referring to KMUK, where the major shareholder is actually Hainan. The stack of spod is worth way more than twice the value of the loan.