Member Info for Bfdinvestor

The amount of tittle tattle on here is nauseous

So why add to it

Who knows Hexam.

The English language is a varied and beautiful thing, despite the attempts by most on here to make it appear the opposite.

When have I ever said everything is Rosie.

It clearly isn't

But nor is it as totally as desperate as you make it out to be.

Please stop lying southcoast

That's actually quite amusing Hexam

Why didn't you simply ask me if I had emailed Emma Woollard again rather than playing to the troll herd think.

I would have answered yes but I haven't had a reply as of yet.

Hexam your arrogance is amazing.

Because you fail to understand something so simple, you can't even countenance that you could possibly be wrong.

You seemed to imply there was something untoward in the number of posts I had made today when others had made far more.

I guess the herd instinct is really important to you.

Maybe that is where the troll blindness comes from

He doesn't need to email anyone

The term, and therefore the repayment date, is in the RNS

He is obviously too thick to understand it

I wonder how many accounts the fantasist has created to recommend his posts lol

Fed I don't buy the southcoast story that Kamani is running everything for his own benefit

The timing of the Telegraph article is just a little suspect to me.

Kane needs to go, she adds nothing.

Kamani I believe can add value but he is too much of a distraction with his feud with Ashley

Finley I believe is running the show now not Kamani.

Finley needs to pull a massive rabbit out of the hat in the next couple of weeks or I'll be voting against the whole lot

Allegedly Fed

The story has gone from the Telegraph to all intents and purposes. It may come back, who knows, but until it does it's veracity is in real doubt

Fed, given the story doesn't appear to have any prominence on the Telegraph website at all, I doubt it even makes your 1 criteria

Well I explained the difference to you Hexam, so if you don't get it that is your issue not mine.

It also invalidates your 28 posters comment

Maybe go through my post again

It seems to be taking you a long time to count southcoast's posts.

Not really a surprise given they are so numerous. Strange that you focussed on mine. Or, then again, maybe it isn't

Herd think is working well and troll blind as ever

Longdong

Perhaps you could give a single example of a piece of insight chef has provided on this board

What I believe he said CW was that 80% of the people who post here are short on Boo."

Which is what I said but you claimed he said nothing of the sort. Odd.

Incorrect again Hexam. It's not what you said at all

You claimed he had some kind of weird AI model predicting 80% of posters were shouting Boo.

What I wrote is that is that 80% of people are short on Boo.

Which means that they are posting that the sp will go down.

Two entirely different things

I'd have thought a seasoned investor would understand such things.

But while you are into counting things today, perhaps you could confirm how many times southcoast has posted here today.

Far more times than me

Still, why would I expect you to be anything other than troll blind.

Great to see the troll herd think in action though.

What I believe he said CW was that 80% of the people who post here are short on Boo.

That is an understatement.

Thanks for the usual grown up response tho

I don't think he ever said anything of the sort.

I don't mind negative comments because there is plenty to be negative about

What I do object to is the constant lying, name calling and need to drown out anything that is remotely positive. Or anything that challenges the group think of the largely uninvested

For example, how many jumped on and supported Southcoast's inane claim, repeated literally hundreds of times that suspension was "nailed on" by last Friday

Crap - just about everything he said was nonsense and he said it over and over again which is why I filtered him

So you don't believe the vast majority of posts here are negative, with a significant portion from people who hold no investment Hexam

Troll blind as ever

But trust me, green is good

Do you have any actual evidence of people not being invested? That'd be a no

Actually that would be a yes Bon Scott. Because the likes of Spidey, Crawshaw, the crow man and a whole bunch of others have stated so, openly on here.

It's one of the reasons I filtered them.

Do you have any actual evidence of people not being invested? That'd be a no

Actually that would be a yes Bon Scott. Because the likes of Spidey, Crawshaw, the crow man and a whole bunch of others have stated so, openly on here.

It's one of the reasons I filtered them.

Kachrafilter I tend to agree with you on the specific

However my point is he said nothing offensive or nothing that wasn't largely true.

The whole bunch of uninvested trolls, who have had him removed , seems to be glorying in their supposed achievement judging by this headline

They equally add zero value and certainly used to repeat the same lies and abuse on a daily basis. I guess they still are although I no longer see their posts.

So it's not the person being removed that annoys me, it's the manner of it and the quality of the moderation

I believe that Putin cleaned up the Russian media in much the same way