Member Info for beinthelead

Finally. Some sense.

As in, innovating the way a centuries old industry has operated. Innovating to make the process more efficient, sustainable?

Nah, I’ll take the methane emitting, diesel chugging, high labour cost, low yield, pesticide ridden produce any day.

What a ridiculous way to view the world. Do you blame BH for your personal issues? Think about that before you reply using your smartphone. Make sure that VPN is tuned on. Via TOR.

Maybe too logical - if AffiDX was being presented by Medusa, we’d have insight all over Twitter. Suggest assume AffiDX is not being presented until we hear.

Monkshood - The spike does not like the cold, as you know. Hence frozen sample gate. They did not target the N protein because they believe targeting the S, for their chosen sample method was superior. Saliva or not.

Vatic are targeting the S for their saliva test. They use more confident language than Avacta, citing S targeting as their USP.

“The proprietary Know Now® test, detects the spike protein to the virus (not the nucleocapsid protein as with all other lateral flow antigen tests) and this spike is only apparent on live virus, therefore the test only identifies those people with current infection. It is a true infectivity test.”

Regardless of any conspiracy theories around why we were not chosen by the government; Avacta has developed a cracking test. End of. Probably the best. That’s not debatable, it’s fact.

Sales and commercialisation is another discussion.

You are correct. The abundance/prevelance of ‘live’ S is what makes it more valid for our sample method.

This S&N debate is pure conjecture. Our test has the best performing data set on the market. Are the current mutations affecting performance? No. Zero.

Avacta and Vatic are S targeting. I believe, for good reason.

Ripley is not rude and abusive to those who don’t deserve it. Reasoned debate is had. You, Touk, are just poking to be a troll.

If AgentB is that certain HUA will be a dud, she should have sold her entire holding and bought back an amount that sits with her risk profile. But yet, we have another repetitive basher that maintains a ‘small holding’ for when the tide turns.

Moaning gets you nowhere. No LT investor is happy with the SP decline. Seems obvious, but clearly not to some.

AS is Avacta’s biggest ramper. Some blame Myles - 20 countries, sell all we can make etc. Remember that? That’s quite rampy. He certainly made me put my hand in my pocket. Ridiculous behaviour.

However; This will not be the first time you’ll be sucked into a rollercoaster SP. I’m content because I invested in Avacta above all else. My belief remains the same.I believe the LFT will be a huge success.

Best not let the frustration get the better if you. Easy done. The SP is at a ‘bottom drawer’ point at the moment. I’ll only get excited on next news. Until then, we’re out of sentiment to strip. The market has punished AS’s ramps.

Agent - what is your agenda? We’re adults on an anonymous forum. It’s ok, you can share.

Avacta BB does not require a constant discussion re new world order theory. It has no basis. Speaking from experience, delays and issues are often far less glamorous than the fantasy.

Are you trying to educate us re the new world order theory? If so, set up a blog and post a link. We can choose to read as and when.

Facts? Read that definition. This micro cap stuff, inferring that institutional investors are about to ‘sell off’, is not fact.

SP vs MCap. If you’ve nothing aid value to add…

Touk - good info? Define good. What does good look like to you??

You have provided/provide nothing of use to this board, other than moaning.

From Agent, not you Vegas

Ridiculous. Constant drivel.

@Cliostock - thanks mate.

Bump - anyone able to help?

@researcher1 - is the croda news still imminent? Thanks.

Interesting. Could you repost the link please.

Not sure. This revision was for the Affimer omission if I’m not mistaken?

I was pointing out that they’ve spiked by 100% based on a speculative deal to sell a poor test with poor validation.

We’re down by a great deal on ATH’s. Once we receive HUA for the best test out there, we’ll move.