Member Info for BeardedDragon

In my humble opinion most of the transactions after 4.15pm showing as sells are probably buys. The spread is miniscule with most deals being around the 43.7p mark.

Some clever Dick on here predicted a 42p bottom, which it reached late morning I believe.

Pete, what on earth does this comment mean..."around £1.50-£1.80 itnis this which II willa celt and Wood sell!!"? Having read both your posts carefully, I am much more inclined to favour Pickedpeck's business acumen over yours. Certainly no reason for him to be filtered unless you are Trump in disguise, blocking anybody with an opposing view.

Looking at previous Sidara/Wood communications, I sincerely doubt that anything will be revealed within 18 working hours. For me, an extra few days/weeks makes little difference.

My point is that Sidara was mentioned in the RNS headline. Why was that?

Pete, owing to Islamic factors, the big RNS won't land until Monday/Tuesday but otherwise I am in agreement, hence my substantial top-up earlier today. Good luck.

The warm sunshine makes me feel optimistic so I have just doubled my holding at 43p safe in the knowledge that, even if the sale falls through, it won't be trading below 75p by the year end. If the sale does go through, it's holiday time.

45Bob, on 7th November you said you were taking a punt on WG at which time the price appears to have been 71.25p so where is your profit?

At 42p it offers an excellent buying opportunity.

My sell target is currently 69.95p to achieve my customary 20% profit. Should I amend it?

Where did you find this particular statement, Laura?

SG2025, why does your query to AI refer to May 2025 and why does AI not rectify the error? It shows its futility.

I don't think so. It definitely won't fall below 150p and will probably rise to 250p soon enough. Mark my words.

Does anybody know why the RNS issued at 3pm yesterday is described on here as... Form 8.3 - [Wood Group (John) plc/Sidara]..when Sidara was not even mentioned therein? A Freudian slip perhaps?

talies mate, why not post on the actual thread in which johnny made his comments? i have no idea what you are referring to and cannot be ****d to scroll through umpteen threads to locate it.

That is a blatant lie. What the RNS actually says is;

The extension is subject to the submission of an extended bank guarantee of $600,000 ("Bank Guarantee"), to be provided within 15 days from the issuance of the extension letter. The Company has applied for the Bank Guarantee extension and a further announcement will be made in due course.

Definitely no assurance that no additional funding required. You should be reported for telling porkies, Lordsicky.

Very unlikely. Am expecting a slight dip towards 42p until the news finally breaks.

Meanwhile, buy on any dips, folks.

But Johnny, that doesn't specify whether they are long or short positions. You need to scroll further down the page.

And he starts yet another bloody thread. What a complete plonker! You can respond to your own posts, mate.