Member Info for Beamer21

I don't think that the dividend will be scrapped/postponed, however, we will need to wait until 10th November when the H1/interims are released

danmc - it's my opinion that they are buy trades. Once reported trades are factored in and yesterday we closed fractionally higher rather than lower It will be interesting to see the FCA short report over the next week

Another big trade just appeared at 16.41 - 130,432 shares at 45.25p - looks to be another buy trade

Eggs - it certainly would be nice to see some consistent flurries of A trade buying but unfortunately the really big players are sadly too clever)-: It does however look as though something is happening behind the scenes albeit slowly Never heard of Vanderlande but they're big on a global scale - all good

went through at 13.38 today Both at mid price 44.375p leading me to believe that they are buy trades as that volume would carry a big discount if they were sell trades. Could this be the final tranche of Fil's holding? The two trades totalled 856,522 shares £380k

to 5.67% - painfully slow but let's hope it continues In the absence of the regular rinse and repeats that we have seen historically I'm encouraged that shorts might actually be making an exit. Plenty of more fruitful short opportunities around at the mo.

Confirming today's drop primarily caused by profit taking as a result of the recent rise in share price - no mention of the meddling hedge funds though... Presentation on 6th November to highlight further cost savings http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-3296475/IAG-falls-despite-airline-upping-profit-outlook-Q3-beats-forecasts.html

a couple of hedge funds meddling - sit tight, normal business will resume shortly Excellent results with great forward growth plus a maiden dividend

Should say 'jump in quarterly operating profits' !!!

34% jump in quarterly operating costs 2015 operating profit guidance revised upwards to 2.25bn - 2.3bn euros

from the beginning, despite delays and changes to the board and operational structure Odey chose to significantly increase their holding to circa 19% in September - why? CrispIn Odey is considered to be one of the best....

K3VMC - a little trigger happy this afternoon or another LSE malfunction?

to 5.77%

K3VMC - countrywide mandates are set to rise. There are reasons why Latin America spearheaded e invoicing We know Russia is likely to go down the same route

Easyinvestor - there is a definite need, e invoicing is on the rise globally. Think about the overheads of a global companies accounting function/shared services centre - using Tungsten reduces costs and provides simplification for both buyer and supplier.

Dollarzpounds - Buyers using Tungsten network for e invoicing do pay a fee - licensing/volume model. From the latest trading statement it appears that these fees have been under review and have been subject to increases Additional services also attract fee's and subscriptions

GSmiley - thanks for your input, I wish you well with future investments Although not happy with the mounting delays I am now happy that we have a board in place who will guide TUNG through to the appropriate business/operating model resulting in a sustainable profitable business - E Invoicing is becoming standard practice, particularly for global organisations and countries which need to curtail improper practices. TUNG currently have a distinct advantage as I believe they are the only organisation that is truly legally compliant in 47 countries - Tungsten need to ensure that they maintain this advantage The B2G mandates in the US and EU will speed up adoption significantly Tungsten do charge suppliers for using their network, the amount depends on the transaction type and volume but typically they pay both a subscription fee and invoice processing fee

in shorts - down to 5.83% with Numeric reducing to 1.34% as of 23/10 Every little helps!

a momentary thing subject to manipulation. I'm confident that those that choose to stay long term will be rewarded - as posted earlier shorts have reduced again slightly to 5.95% It's fair to say that I'm not a great believer in TEP as I don't feel that the typical TUNG supplier requires such a service as they will be benefiting from a much more transparent invoice/accounts payable process which should as standard significantly shorten the supplier payment cycle. I feel that invoice discounting has significantly more scope with advantages to both buyer and supplier Let's not forget that currently Tungsten work with 67% of the FTSE 100 and 56% of the Fortune 500 - the recent EU and U.S. B2G mandates will accelerate acceptance and take up

down again slightly to 5.95%