Post 3 - What Achieves same result as a t\over?6 Aug 2019 18:38
If CPO5 could be sold to Geopark for $150-180m cash, then Amer could offer a 5:2 share buy back at 25p, reducing shares in issue form 1,215k to 700k, Amer would earn $130m after tax, it could pay a 0.5p dividend guaranteed for 2-3 years until output and reserves recover under the OXY deal, by holding $15m to one side for a divi that costs 40% less to maintain.
Amer Ex CPO5 would be worth £150m before OXY kicks in , where we were at 12p a share but with only 700m in circulation the 25p a share could be maintained by way of yield. The BOD would need to change GC gone, Coller puts a few men in and he could see out his vision for that region. So potential for Cake and eat it, PI's get 25p for 40% of their shares and still hold Amer with yield at mid 20's ready for OXY & OBA next 6-9 months.
Only a guess, an option that's not a takeover but doable. This man has stayed the course through all this, as I said before Amer has never properly publicised the positive social reforms it does in the PUT region by taking out illicit drugs off the market and replace with farming. That's ESG in my book, big time. Only a guess, if he breaks up the rest, then he may insist on a social reform commitment. Last post. GLA.
Last point, I could not quite understand why Amer held back more drilling, didn't take out debt and let ONGC rule the roost and SP slide . In a share buy back it makes sense, the future earnings potential is still held back for the existing remaining shareholders, in a takeover it is LOST to the successful bidder at an SP less than 40p. IMO planned a while ago.
I think Coller is great news for this process, it replaces a negative unknown Michinko structure, with a very positive one. GLA
Last post. Only a guess. CPO% is the problem alongside the BOD.