Member Info for Banburyboy

I have to say I have never felt better about being locked into a suspended share.

- relentless contract wins.

- news on staff pay awards

- upbeat comments from employees posting.

Lots of disputes and disagreement here.

The bottom line most agree on is that it's not going bust, we wouldn't be losing our money, and on suspension being lifted, this will be more than 18p.

Buying in the low twenties was a risk, but I'm really happy I did it.

Typical.RRR SP unexplained SP movement.

I suspect news is due and the Insider community knows what news and is positioning themselves self.

Must be a buyer / taker for the sells

Twenty years of run for the few by the few.

Views ?

Dicko out with his 75m.

Liquid Silvef busy making multiples of his original stake by trading

Black estates got bored.

Lundys clients pushing down the SP fo the next placing?.

So many possibilities but only RRR.

Seems to suggest CPR early Q4 - October and first gas late December.

First time I've heard timelines mentioned anywhere not even from the company.

We seem to have a communication blackout.

With the current strategy being "good things come to those who wait".

Complementing that other strategy pillar " RRR is in a good place".

Hopefully all holders are ouzing confidence and the naysayers will get what they deserve.

Hydras - explanation seems reasonable to me but not shorting per se rather automatic trade bots [ which can buy or sell].

The link between this SP activity and some of the very negative postings on ADVFN appears imaginary to me.

The reality is ZPHR has potential but no clear timetable or plan to production as mentioned by other posters.

When it gas that hopefully the "bots" will change direction ?

Heavily invested and want this to do well but quite a few rose tinted glasses on here for me.

So does it logically follow that all this short cabal that seems to be fashionable on here is also nonsense ?

Yes there are a number of vociferous posters who don't have a good word to say and want to talk ZPHR down at every juncture but they exist on many boards and it's not a conspiracy.

Personally I think this share is being traded. Logically if you sold on news and broght back in at lower prices you would be up a lot more than those of us who are holding on for dear life.

CH needs a seriously good RNS to break the cycle and whilst good the news thus far has not been good enough as others posted yesterday.

On 31st March 25 he promised an Operations update on DRC and other interests in April.

Can you tell him it's now June ?

A sane person ( not you Nike ] would conclude zero progress and developments. Oh I forgot the old chestnut it's commercial in confidence hence no news.

I remember them putting that statement ( commercial) in the Lithium export nonsense.

Makes for spinning a Bell yarn longer.

We must be on the cusp of next news being make or break ? Problem is trust and will it be nonsense or not ? The form book is on the former.

Dogs. My main point is the latest March information from Bell March 25 says the FASO kit was in customs.

Which makes the two RNSs in October and November 24 promising FASO production in 2024. At best fanciful and nonsense.

It's classic RRR.

Everything is nonsense.

Another week passes another 90k spu*ked against the wall and added to debt and no doubt soon to be convertible by Red Rock.

The major problem is believability on the next big RNS as they have got so used to just releasing nonsense why will this be different ?

Https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/RRR/update-of-major-interests-follow-up-kfiwsaeuo3lrcvg.html

Helpful I'm just interested. This RNS and the one of 7th October are 7 - 9 months in the rear view mirror.

Andrew says all his RNSs are precise and accurate.

I disagree every word he ever puts to writing to the letter are nonsense.

Indulge me what parts of this are not not nonsense?

I gave you some examples

- DRC imminent 3 and a half years ago.

- First Lithium exports Nov 23.

-FASO and COTE production this and the 7th October RNS in 2024.

- Half year report operations update by April 25.

None of this happened yet you claim.i make things up and three of the halfwits on here agreed.

Can you be more specific what have I made up ?

None of these four statements is true.

Not at all bigbazooka. Talk of shorting is as I say, imo hugely overdone. Look at my posting history I was excited when it was rising before news.

Thanks for the additional information agreed and am happier.

Just tying to bring some constructive balance. The other site is frequented by bashers and ZPHR here on LSE has 'groupies" who take offence see conspiracy at everything questioning however small.

Would be delighted if this is the real deal bring it on. But let's not stiffle posters just wanting a discussion by calling them shorters. Too Trumpian for me.

Sentena -I agree the cabal of shorters is hugely overdone. The cheerleaders I think are overdoing the hyperbole.

Questions for me are:

1. The $100m sounds good on Willaston and is a vote of confidence in the companies expertise. But what's in it for ZPHR ? Nothing in the short to medium term and longer term what's the hurdle rate to clear for a cash share.

2. Paradox well reserves 0.8 - 1.2m barrels. They were targeting up to 2m. No mention of selling liquids on Utah market as with earlier test. I think the benchmarking top 6% compares our predominantly gas play with others more oil play so questions for me on comparability.

Still pleased that agencies see value in terms of their SP targets. For me I have modified my expectations still hoping for a decent profit bit lots more needed from CH to get the blow out many on here are convinced about.

Sorry molotov.

Read the RNS.

It tells you lender gets a 100% until a hurdle rate is met.

Scant in detail.

I'm not your enermy, just looking for balance as you know from the other board.

Darwel the question is what does the specialist invester think now ?

He was hoping for up to 2m recoverable barrels he got 0.8 to 1.2m barrels based on the last RNS.

Split 50:50 with ZPHR is that enough to progress ?

Still happy with my investment but not sure it's quite the liechanging prospect others are suggesting.

Molotov

There is scant detail on the $100m

Except investers keep the cash flow until a hurdle rate is set.

Much as I wish it was not the case it's a slow burner for the now. With no definite cash flow and any likely benefit to ZPHR someway off I.e years.

It's a vote of confidence but nothing that in my opinion will drive immediate value.

Helpful you can work out the blended rate on all RRR debt from note 11 of the interims.

It's not my figures it's the company's.

The rate on £4m of CLNs was 30%.

The rate on the other debt was a blended rate much higher. Not as high as the famed 0.5% a day the auditors highlighted and the company hid but very high.

The figure of £1.5m finance charges per annum is again the companies figure not mine.

It's not hard to know these numbers. They are not ours they are the companies.

Relentlessly accusing people of making things up when you don't have a defence is a pretty pathetic stance.

They are there for all to see.

Long story Alan but RRR have a nailed on insider who posts in my opinion and many others inappropriately.

We post to give the ill-informed some balance.

Https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/helpful/?page=6

Helpful

I never made an estimate of the royalty to the end of June as its unknowable.

Oh yes you did on the 8th May 2025.

It was $27,945.

Which of us makes things up ?

Your Trumpian defence of everything wears thin.

We should stick to ZPHR your posts were very informative and balanced and I appreciated them.

Thanks again Helpful.

You really do have a lot to add. You should post outside of our normal stomping ground more oftern ?

Helpful - all my posts on ZPHR say I'm not an expert if you read them. I'm asking questions. Thank you for the response I have learnt something.