RE: Potential downside19 Apr 2022 10:47
I don't see the funding as a significant problem assuming that we get the CPR that we expect and our partner ONHYM is able to navigate any political issues. Generally projects can become quite complex but it is over a year since we signed a deal with Subsea Integration Alliance for FEED and a potential $500m subsea contract which means that many of the key contractual, cost and schedule issues will have been discussed - with Subsea installation at this depth we will need access to a major Vessel which hopefully will already been 'scheduled in to their vessel programme' based on their March 3rd Presentation Subsea 7 have a pretty good order book. This is pipeline likely to be a hard pipe - most of reeled vessels can lay up to 14" dia. and the latest addition to the S7 fleet can lay up to 20" - the non reeled vessels can do pretty much any size but are unlikely to be used on what is a relatively small pipeline. One of the advantages of being a small operator is that we don't have a huge hopper of projects and long chain of command when it comes to contracting, we are nimble and I am sure AP will be able to crack a deal - hopefully ONHYM can support this nimble approach - in the One Alliance world $300-500m is a large project which means they will be keen to get this booked. Getting our numbers done will support the pipeline sizing and we can they get cost and schedule data for FID.