RE: Pipeline webpage17 Oct 2024 11:54
Thanks for the update Timster (https://avacta.com/pipeline/)
1 This chart confirms AVA3996 is history, - nothing new there.
2 One of the three indications is breast cancer.
CC had this to say on return from the last AACR:
"There were essentially three stakeholder groups that attended, and the conversations with each of them were quite important.
The first, the scientists and the oncologist.
So these are the mainstay of the attendees at AACR.
They were quite excited about the data, asking about the next steps for AVA6000, and several oncologists who came just with ideas for warheads.
We've got this toxic drug and patient populations that we could use them for.
There was a lot of interest around FAP high versus FAP mid and that choice of warhead and how important it is.
The second stakeholder group that I'll mention were representatives from other pharma and biotech companies.
We had made some invitations to those that had been ongoing. And I can tell you, if Simon was here, he would tell you that most of the major players in this space actually stopped by to see the data.
And so there were some ongoing conversations and some new conversations there.
Like I mentioned earlier, these kinds of commercial deals are really unlocked by this clinical proof of concept and the proof of mechanism data that we have here.
The third group, which were near and dear to my heart, if any of you follow me on Twitter, you know that many of my followers are in this group. They are patient advocates.
There were many patient advocates who I know who actually dropped by, and they're asking about next steps for AVA6000.
One advocate was from the Metastatic Breast Cancer Coalition. (- possibly https://www.pabreastcancer.org/)
And just asking about both AVA6000 what's in the future? And then what also might we be doing?
What other drugs might we be able to precision enable?"
+++
The third group IMO might possibly be a source of part funding for Avacta breast cancer research, (AVA 6000 / AVA 6103)
Not just one but a number of charities providing funds.
They are asking what's next for Breast Cancer Therapeutics.
CC could state with some confidence now, that Avact research funding would be worthwhile.