Historic NAV12 May 2021 13:09
This is a very unique series of events that has resulted in such an undervalued sp imho. Tern have opted for a VC model to be carried out in an AIM listing. I believe they RTO'd a company already listed in order to do this. As such they, to this day, use the NAV of their original investment amounts. Peruse the financial statements to see if I'm telling the truth, this is your money at stake. So NAV has not priced in any progress at the companies, which is clear for all to see via the recent presentation as well as the ongoing PR of the investees themselves. However, even a great deal of this is shrouded in the secrecy of NDAs, which is perfectly understandable in the context of IoT security. The downside of this historically,in some LTHs opinions, is that previous fundraising has often been tied to a sorely outdated NAV. This has resulted in unnecessary levels of dilution (I would state that 330m shares is respectably low, but I understand the view considering Tern had c.100m shares not too many years ago). The flip side is that it has kept the sp suppressed to an unbelievably low trading range, which means an absolute monster rerate is in the process of unfolding. Dyor if you're serious, but quite frankly I don't care what you do. It won't stop the price surging past previous highs if you sell your stake. I'm holding for many multiples of today's sp.