Member Info for athansius

Would the costs of ITM's hydrogen be prohobotive. I say that because I presume they produce 5 9s hydrogen for use in PEM fuel cells. Our cells only require 3 9s.....one of their big advantages and one that I think has been under appreciated thus far.

Garonne....they promised 1 GW by 2020, not 1 MW. Although they haven't yet managed to achieve even that. I am very hopeful that they will during 2020 though

Good luck Mucksy .................we all have our afc-related dreams and I hope yours come true
A

Good question Mucksy....wish I had a sensible answer!

Simple answer is that I still think this will hit £1 within 2 years. And then be taken out at £1- £1.50. It's a lot further from 19p to £1 than it is from 19p to zero. I can afford to lose the money (just) but to get over £1 would be life changing for me. So in terms of lifestyle and economic security no downside but a lot of upside.

BW
A

Only abusive to Fred who deserves it.
I may make an exception for you however.
Perhaps you could try contributing something positive to the board?

Thanks Reonin

Sadly AFC is a far bigger proportion of my portfolio than any financial adviser would admit to being sensible. If it goes up I'm a trading genius....if it goes down I'm either stupid or greedy. I'm prepared to take the risk as I think the upside potential significantly outweighs the downside.

I really want to see AFC do well, and think they have both an ecological and economic role to play. It annoys me intensely when the de rampers come here with facts, some true, some spurious, but none that we are not all aware of. They feel spiteful, vindictive and opportunistic.

But it also annoys me when AFC promise a firestorm of communication and follow it up over the next week with a tweet. This is not a firestorm, in the same way that the small ripples on the boating lake I am presently looking at do not constitute a tsunami. Adam, take note.

I do wonder if the promise of the imminent social media blitz was part responsible for the huge spike this week. If so it was irresponsible and misleading. The FCA would have something to say about it. So what ever it is AFC think they have to announce, they should jolly well get on with it.

Re your post taskmaster

Nope....I have never sold an AFC share except to transfer it to my ISA. I have been here ten years. I have skin in the game in the form of nearly two million (shares not pounds).

I have no links to the financial industry. I am long term positive about AFC and the product but short term very frustrated at management behaviours.

If you read my extensive posting history you will find it there. Please modify your future comments accordingly.

Well the spike on Wednesday was nice, but already we have lost most of the gain. It was ever thus with AFC. As is silence from the CEO.

Despite that they Ceres still fell a lot less than Afc in percentage terms and the shares were rapidly picked up. Admittedly afc had a very large rise the day before.

An example of why we are capitalised at so much less than ITM. They are providing tangible progress in the new hydrogen economy. We need this sort of RNS from AFC.

Shame that ITM are partnering with Ballard......maybe one day soon AFC will be in a position to partner this sort of project.

Fred, you are a nasty spiteful little person.
We pity you

I think we will tread water now.....21.5p

Opinions reasonably held are welcome. Polarised and entrenched views citing old evidence are not. I'm afraid the boards are rife with people who spread false information and seek to mislead.

Have you heard of Tom Winnifrith?

Is that the same Fred who told me I should sell at 4p?

We may....I’m actually now very slightly in profit.

My prediction of 20p on Friday was wide of the mark!!

The paid deramper is earning his money today.
Who else is pleased to see this rise after Schroeder’s sold out at 25% less?!

Indeed southerhay....people willing to pay 0.2045 for AFC this morning

17-18 to open tomorrow and 20-21 by the end of the week??

Market seems to like it. Heading to 2m traded in first 30 mins

I'm surprised this needed an RNS, but good on them for putting it out to communicate.

Although nothing substantive ie no orders, it is positive in tone and notes the two significant changes - that government is now getting behind green energy and that public and industry opinion is swinging the same way.

It's hard to know if EV, genset replacement or Alkamem will provide our first true commercial revenue. I* get the feeling ti will not be long before we know and suspect AFC is involved in some very advanced discussions.