Member Info for Arsenal221

Would think that it just might be that Frr have been given the Injunction.
If so though there might be another set date for it to be reviewed again.

Phil
Good post & Recd

Will say that if this judge can just hand over more time to the virus then why could he not say same on TRO.
Still, as long as this does get to trial by jury Frr I believe will be successful unless the judge thinks of someway of them not.

Agree
When we do let's hope that after all this crap we get something worthwhile at end.

As mentioned earlier this judge, seems to be doing all he can on helping Hopeshit

I cannot understand why anyone, is wasting the time with this cretin.
It can do f.c.k. all, so just filter the waste of space.

Will add, if he allows the extension.

This judge does seem to be helping Hope as much, as possible of which includes not allowing the TRO.

6 June hearing for injunction of some sort unless changed.

It says " extension of time for answer" so does it mean they have a bit longer to put their briefs in on the Injunction.
Let's hope find out sometime today.

Would think above comes well before anything else, as without it then nothing else matters.

Now Frr have got to come clean on whether they have the evidence of which to add on Caymens change or just pay the f.c.k.er off.

Well said
Enjoy

Generally I have been thinking & said along same lines about this judge, as below.

The FRR legal team must be furious! Seeborg needs to restudy the evidence before him - typical of the incompetence of some of these judges! Therefore his entire ‘merits’ conclusion is questionable!

I have to say I’m perplexed with Richard Seeborg’s (Judge) ruling.
It would appear he has either completely ignored or not even read FRR’s legal team’s response dated 7 May. Seeborg correctly states that in the Cayman January ruling, Kawaley opines that “FRR has no realistic prospect of success”. But Kawaley contradicts/corrects himself in the Feb ruling, which FRR’s legal team mentions in their response.
Importantly they state, "Finally, the Cayman Islands court confirmed that, while it had
“discharge[ed] the Interim Injunction” granted to Plaintiffs, it believed that
“Plaintiffs’ appeal against that decision had realistic prospects of success….”

So Kawaley has corrected his initial opinion, but Seeborg appears oblivious to all of this and makes no mention of the Feb Cayman ruling.

The FRR legal team must be furious! Seeborg needs to restudy the evidence before him - typical of the incompetence of some of these judges! Therefore his entire ‘merits’ conclusion is questionable!

Happy for any of the legal entities on here to clarify…

Will add that the one big positive we would love on seeing, is that this crap legal s.h.i.t. is no longer & that includes paying Hopeless off.

As they say all go ahead at well head the on that being the case then would mark that as a positive.

Was aimed at daddy's boy

WOSpace

Is the waste of space still going on about his daddy buying him the shares.
The saddo obviously has nothing better to do & his supposed to be in his 20s that makes it even worse.