RE: don't6 Mar 2018 08:04
Additionally, to what Jimmy00 said, they say this as if SDX management are under threat or being headhunted to go elsewhere? I don't see how any CEO/CFO would leave a company in a strong financial position to go elsewhere, especially with the pipeline SDX has...
Lets put this into easier terms to understand, like football... (most people understand football) if you were Wolverhampton Wanderers F.C. manager, sitting a comfortable 1st in the championship with 73pts, close to getting promoted to the Premier League why would you leave for a team like Southampton (in the Premier League) who are fighting for relegation (sure, the pay may be more but its more risky than your current postion) or, why would you leave for another team in the Championship which are in a worse position than yourself, which will involve more work for you... you wouldn't... you would simply stay to build your CV. - That is the point here, I believe all mangment are going to stay in SDX, based on current financials, asset pipeline etc.. there is no reason for them to leave...
They have labeled this as 'strategic' to keep key team members at SDX, but what they really should have said is "we want to profit from this, and take advantage of the current SP - they know the situation with SDX is good, they're insiders for christ sake.
Like I said earlier, wool over the eyes situation. Results were going to be good, we all already anticipated that... they have seen an opportunity and want to profit from it as well, that's why people here are more annoyed, more so the level of deception here rather than acting in shareholders best interest.