Member Info for Andii

Here is an image someone made of the links between companies

https://ibb.co/zhr1tc8K

"Tiger Alpha cubs"

If you can't find it let me know

The Git hub page for Tiger Alpha subnet however talks exclusively about a trading bot and data analytics Ai subnet. So far nothing about drones or the military......

Are you in the telegram group? This was uncovered and discussed in depth on the 9th July.

This other Tiger Alpha PLC has a few common directors. And one Andrew McCartney,

ex ceo of Microsoft UK ventures

Are those easier to produce than the Kiid forms?

A re-rate would surely approach recent all time high price of 0.55p which would be 5.5p after consolidation. Maybe 3.5p could be a near term target following a few bullish RNS's

We need the change in name before HL and AJ Bell might allow buying. Removing the name "investments" from the company name.

This is pending with announcement to follow shortly according to yesterday's RNS

Here is a reminder of what our subnet 107 Tiger Alpha will do

https://github.com/tigerinvests-com/sn107-alpha

Here is a pdf explaining how the the bittensor network works

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JDDxJGkwFhf5BOkkNnKojIMJ7RDaEj3G/view?usp=drivesdk

Here is Tiger Alpha subnet generstimg 15TAO per day. Each TAO is worth $400 so the subnet is generating $6k per day or $2.19m per year.

https://taostats.io/subnets/107/chart

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JDDxJGkwFhf5BOkkNnKojIMJ7RDaEj3G/view?usp=drivesdk

Successful subnets in the top 10 are generating over 15x this and when they reinvest the earned TAO they can make further returns through staking rewards. There is also upside potential in the TAO coin which could also multibag

The consolidated price will be whatever the share price on the day of consolidation multiplied by 10.

If its 0.3p then the new price will be 3p after consolidation

We need 23p for £100m market cap after the 10:1

Currently market cap is £10m

Maybe once we hit £100m market cap we could consider some M&A. Until then I think it.wouod be a distraction from growing the crypto tech side of the business

I see Jonathan Bixby is also executive chairman of PNIX

They hold;

247 BTC worth £22M

1,871 ETH worth £5.19M

100,036 SOL worth £13.8M

https://polaris.brighterir.com/public/nft_investments/news/rns/story/rm8175w

Arok venture capital investment we dont know the true returns. There is no official.accounting and we dont know the value of our latest $250k cash (not arok coin) investment there. I already covered this and made it one of the questions worth asking Bixby at the AGM as he verbally told us last month that there had been a positive return on our new $250k investment there.

Standard strategies is at 0.05 cad $

We bought 20.3m shares for £250k

That's £0.012 per share or or around 0.0258 cad $ per share

Our investment in standard strategies is up almost 100%

https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/sbtc?countrycode=ca

107 online over the weekend and hits the ground running ramping up revenue

126 fully outfitted and starts generating emissions

Name change and dual listing launch Monday (ish)

Quite exciting

Ii waved the phone dealing charge for me when I bought over the phone

Why can't it be asked at the AGM? Maybe quizz the BOD over drinks after the official proceedings?

We just had the full year results, then the AGM straight after, yet share holders haven't had the opertunity for a Q&A, maybe that's the question that needs put to the BOD at the AGM?

Is it not possible to email questions to be asked at the AGM to the company, that's often stated in an AGM notice RNS.

So Tiger acquired the third last subnet available for $25k, 10% below the going rate

A week later they RNS'd about their first subnet Tiger Alpha. And as a side note, announced that Tiger Beta would go online on the 30th june. Date of that RNS? 30th june. So they announced going live the same day it apparently didnt go live.

Meanwhile registration of UID's started to pick up pace

https://taostats.io/subnets/126/registration?limit=100&page=2

What did Bixby mean by going live? Registration of miners and UID's going live? Or launching an Ai offering. Seems a bit premature to launch an Ai offering with no miners yet established on the UID's...

Subnet 107 Tiger Alpha, is that live? It is earning emissions but doesn't have an Ai offering. Having two subnets is very lucrative. Both subnets are almost entirely filled with miners now (107 has 256 and 126 has over 200). Each miner costs over £15k in hardware costs.

Rome wasn't built in a day.

As I said I will look forward to your interigation of Bixby

Some questions for you may consider asking

>Did you intend to launch an Ai to subnet 126 on the 3th june as RNS'd 30th june

>What is the minimum required UID's out of the possible 256 required to bring a subnet online, and considering there were only 4 UID's in place on the 30th june, was the comment "coming online 30th june" premature or were you meaning ready for miners to be registered, and not a full Ai launch

>What is the intended Ai offering to be launched onto Alpha and Beta

>What is the cost of a miner UID, does Tiger own many of the miners on subnets 107 and 126

>Is there a risk of losing one or both subnets if no full ai launch is forthcoming in the short term

>What is the current value of the $250k venture capital investment into Arok made recently

>what is the reason behind the consolidation

>does a name change mean a KIID is not required

>how big a job is producing a kiid, how many pages document would this be and is it being considered

>is there a plan for a US listing

>Will Tiger keep hold of TAO and announce this as a crypto strategy

>is there an investor presentation planned

>What oversight is there over standard strategies, considering Tigher hold over 26% of their shares

>Is there a plan to dispose of mining assets to remove the requirement for KIID and to streamline the business

And some just for you to ask to allow you to sleep at night

>Do Tiger check the share register monthly to track institutional buying/selling

>Have Tiger been in on going discussions with those brokers who dont allow/have restricted buying

Irish, claiming the FCA are investigating two companies which forced them to release TR-1's is delusional.

If you are a large holder, you could do yourself a favour and stop having public breakdowns casting unnessecery doubt on a public forum which could kill sentiment and drive the price down further.

Best course of action? Attend the AGM next monday and voice all your concerns then report back on here in a logical and coherent manner. Otherwise you are going to drive new investors away and just fill the board with unnecessary arguing.

We have had two TR-1's with two holders still above 3% threshold. The 3m sales have dried up. If you think the FCA have been informed then great, maybe we now see a TR-1 if anyone else crosses a reportable threshold or drops below 3%. If they dont? Then we wait for them to stop selling (like they most likely have for now due to the TR-1's!)

Crikey, next TR-1 might be for an increase in holding size if Tiger Beta comes online and goes on a run! Hopefully it doesn't get launched with Arok unless we can get some clear evidence that Arok has evolved and is now generating decent investor returns. I see the Arok assets under management figure continues to grow weekly.

Could someone ask Bixby if there is an alternative version of Arok making higher returns, and what the $250k investment is now worth? As the public Arok trades website seems to show negative performance which is not what Bixby told the roast guys in a recent interview.

https://arok.vc/en/assets

In my 8 years experience investing in small caps, Tr-1's are usually issued in two scenarios (when the company bothers to fill them out)

When the company passes through a threshold

Or when the company stops selling

Neither TR-1's from the other day passed below the 3% threshold

Both companies notified when they STOPPED selling, (above 3%)

Technically they should have notified when dropping below 6%, 5%, 4% but they (in my experience) never do and instead report when they stop selling.

The TR-1's have the date when they hit the holding specified as over a week ago when the share price was in the high 0.25p an couldnhave been in the 0.35p range when they began selling.

To keep claiming they are dumping at 0.17p to me is verging on fear mongering or at least paranoia as if both companies bought at 0.1p then they have likely top sliced and now on a free carry.

Riverfort tho, not sure when they accumulated their 5.2%, only when they sold down to 3.067%

Maybe they bought aggressivsly on the rise and top sliced on the fall. I would imagine they dont class 0.17p as a price to sell at otherwise they would still be selling and would have notified at a later date when they had stopped. Maybe they are still selling, nobody can be sure but the volume of large printed sells doesn't appear to support it