Member Info for Anders_uk

Is DS concerned about the PIs in EUA?

Yes

Will the customers of Green Metals be concerned about the PIs in EUA?

Yes, because if he screwed us he could screw them. He can’t afford to have his name put through mud with EUA. On the other hand if EUA is a success story, what a great testimonial / reference to put on his new company website?

There you go LL, you can be out of EUA.

LL, stop with the conspiracy theories. Who would want to use Dmitry’s new venture if he screwed us all? You’ve only got a few days left to see what happens, I hope we get new Nomad but stay suspended until flanks licence is sorted, or MT is sold.

Wrong link sorry, this is the channel

https:// t.me/EurasiaMiningC

Remove spaces

https:// t. me/joinchat/HkgNOFg79n3GFQuio7fmZg

For any new or existing investors, here’s a link the EUA investors Telegram channel. Useful links and research. Remember DYOR too.

**********************HkgNOFg79n3GFQuio7fmZg

Sales update and maybe a broker note, then see where SP settles.

They'll know that's a project dead duck from day one if Eurasia ends badly, Dmitry plans for Eurasia will all be under control...

Spikey, if you said this for your first post I would have been more inclined to agreed with you.

'if a company says nothing about an NDA being in place, that might
mean that there is an NDA in place which precludes discussion or
mention of the NDA - but it might just mean that there is no NDA.

without any public domain evidence one way or the other,
people are just speculating about the possibility of NDAs,
but some posters on here keep mentioning NDAs as fact.'

Bottom line is no one knows as with most of the posts on this BB there's a lot of speculation. However, the progress with flanks licence and the Tipil licence and updated works shown on the satellite images can't be argued with.

Spikey, you've just countered your own point perfectly. Everything is speculation by anyone not in the know. You can't say 100% there isn't an NDA either. The NDA would likely have a clause that says you can't make public you're in an NDA anyway.

What we do know is they mentioned banks in an RNS and it's not unreasonable to speculate there would be an NDA involved because a bank would want one of those in place? The fact we've not had a law case against by one of the banks mentioned is good enough for me that those relationships exist. Banks would have come after us by now if that was fake news.

Spikey:

'LHG, can you provide any factual evidence in the
public domain that says there are NDAs in place?

happy to read the RNS/article/link if so.'

LOL, you have no idea. When I sold my business the NDA specifically said my company couldn't mention anything about the deal to market and there was even a clause that said I couldn't accept a further offer once the DD had started (we verbally agreed the price before putting pen to paper on NDA).

Looks like our resident supposedly none-invested commentator has appeared, morning Spikey.

It's a bank holiday today...

AP Angel seem the logical choice, they have a lot of mining companies on their books.

Wonder if oil man Jim is Pizza boy TW? Someone yesterday mentioned that TW used to be an oil stock commentator. Quite a few posts in that sector.

https://www.tomwinnifrith.com/tag/dgoc/

Well said Ian.

I’m questioning the Egypt order, not that we’re selling all capacity.

VanV, you have Graham’s ear on email, why don’t you ask him if it’s 40,000 tests or kits?

Alex, some great info here

https://mobile.twitter.com/AbuseMarket