Member Info for allthatguff

Nobody said anything as 'fact', it was conjecture.

The last update saud February..

"Updated timing on this process will be provided in February 2019 when the beneficiation test work has advanced."

Somebody really hates this "taking private" conjecture. Hilarious.

Maybe some of the "idiots spouting nonsense" as you quaintly put it Rafaley have been in and out of Zioc for the last 8 years. So many false dawns, so many fervant acolytes that fell by the way side. If you stop looking for danger on AIM and censor alternative view points, you will run into trouble soon enough. Group think has cost many a packet, this quashing of posts is ludicrous. I hope Zioc succeeds but you cannot be blind to the risks as well.

Or, still too expensive? Depends if Brockham turns out duff..

Err no :)

But if it fits!

I don't think the Fed has a choice, wall of global bad news..

Breakout possible 980p today??

Really!! You are easily caught by a few nice words.

Should be! But Fres and Hoc barely up so far, hopefully will livk in later in the day. Silver breakout above 15.80 is phenomenal.

Let's just hope it's not a new end..

I reckon they should fly in Todd Kozel from the US lol. Perfect fit for Angus.

You buy the company, not just the asset. This is especially important in the shark infested waters of AIM. Think carefully.

To be fair, there are generally more rampers here who want you you buy at all costs. BEWARE.

"ostrich mentality"

My original comment was to correct a popular misconception. I got irritated by the ostrich mentally when people were clearly wrong and keep repeating garbage. Sorry.

So how is your concept of ownership with BMR working for you then? Maybe AB can explain it to you..

So Bring akways knows better lol. What does the law know?

https://moneyweek.com/merryns-blog/shareholders-and-the-myth-of-company-ownership/

"And the House of Lords was right. Of the 11 tests put forward by Honoré, the relationship between BT and its shareholders satisfies only two, and these rather minor; three are satisfied in part; and six are not met at all. We could make a stronger case for asserting that BT is “owned” by its directors.

So who does own BT? The answer is that no one does, any more than anyone owns the River Thames, the National Gallery, the streets of London, or the air we breathe. "

Wrong..

https://www.ippr.org/blog/who-owns-a-company

From ippr..
"Critically, both in British law and theory shareholders are not ‘owners’ of the company they have shares in, and lack many of the rights and powers typically derived from ownership. In 1948, the Court of Appeal ruled that “shareholders are not, in the eyes of the law, part owners of the company”. The House of Lords strongly reaffirmed that ruling in 2003, a judgement the EU’s recent Shareholder Directive echoed."

And if you want more..
https://www.ft.com/content/7bd1b20a-879b-11e5-90de-f44762bf9896

Under UK law shareholders do not own the business. Just to clear up a popular misconception.