Jaf19 Oct 2016 21:54
A very fair and pertinent question! In addition to Sortapudits comments below, I see little risk of administration here, Jaf. Firstly, given that DCP is already producing revenue, it can easily demonstrate to potential investors/lenders, that it has the clear capacity to pay off debt within a relatively short time. Val has done lots of work on profit margins here and they are as good as any in the diamond industry as far as I can see. Second, the bulk of shares, unlike many Aim companies are owned by institutions and it is in their interests to see the company through this period. Collectively, if not individually, they have the resources to build in support here and my guess is they will because the potential sustained returns here are very healthy. I think people have been spooked because the company is duty bound to outline the fact that unless funding can be found, DCP may not not able to continue as a going concern. Seeing this in print is scary, especially if you have invested significantly. I believe the board will want to continue operating as an independent company because they are heavily invested themselves, in part, but also because they have confidence that high quality stones will be mined and these will make a huge difference to our revenue over time. Unless the terms of any merger or take over are very favourable, I feel PL et al will walk away. The RNS implies that there is more than one interested party in discussions with the board right now -another reason why I believe administration will not happen here. Sleep well all!