Member Info for alfista

Have you considered that the delayed ordering of stock is in the hands of the seller, not the supplier?
Lots and lots of retailers trying to reduce their inventory costs in this period, it most certainly isn't a simple procedure. One would hope that, in an online search, the option of buying direct from Provexis would be thrown up, giving consumers the chance to get their supply. There is a reason that these two retailers are in an out of stock position, but I'm sure it isn't something that Provexis are unaware of.

They did mention that production was delayed by the pandemic, but said it was resolved now. Those of us buying from Provexis seem to have been getting repeat orders on time, this of course gives greater profit margin to the company which is why I choose to buy that way.

Hard to discuss your other shares on here, I noted them and will study. Problem is, if the downside is discussed, holders there get a monk on.
The marketing company that we were both involved in has done really well for me.
Guess your work has been heavily impacted this year, hope you are finding solutions.
ATVB

A familiar name from the past.
Aug 09 if memory serves.
A long time, but looking set to be worthwhile, already is to be fair.
ATVB

Perhaps he meant 3.5 ??
or the ever anxious Naz.
Plaguing another board under another alias no doubt.

The domestic market isn't what is driving Provexis value though is it.
Pointless counting a few UK packs when the world is the market.

'Tevva

Not cheaper, the packaging is easier to recycle than the foil/plastic/cardboard packs.

It's a step forwards having confirmation of the link between the circulatory benefits of Fruitflow against the damage caused by Covid. Someone has to pick up the claim and attach it to a commercial product. Will the first be Provexis with Fruitflow +Omega3 ? If so, then a much larger inventory would be needed, and they talk of supply chain delay in this update. Could current production match a big upturn in demand? hopefully minds are being concentrated around that issue.

On what basis do you make that observation?

Don't you think this update emphasises how much confidentiality Provexis has to respect?
I am certain that there is a lot of work on the Covid subject, but also certain that it just can't be discussed. So we have to suffer the old duffer saying they are doing nothing, whilst the reverse is the case.

That's a load of tosh, they barely supply a housebuilder of any size. If you want to cash in on a house building boom then go for Porcelanosa or Johnsons.

Oslo University is Dr Asim's manor these days, so not at all surprising that they have developed further IP. Seems fair to me that the company pays in shares, hopefully these will be held so that they can share in the benefits of their labours.

I assume you didn't view today's trades before you wrote that twaddle?

Bern expressed the opinion that all trades are openly transparent, and that MM's didn't play any kind of tricks.
So today's crop of 17.49 trades are........?

All I can say is that I had many a long chat with a bloke who worked in amongst them, though I've lots contact with him these days. They regards PI's as total mugs to be milked of their hard earned, and can and will do lots of moves, basically justified by their "making a market" role. Believe what you want, it's a free country, though that is certainly arguable this year. But please don't delude yourself that all "trades" are open and free, you only have to read the constant moans about sells being buys, a vicey versey, that you can read on these boards most days. What are they? Whatever you want them to be usually, the fog of the battlefield.

Bern, your ability to casually insult your fellow posters is second to none.
If you think that the daily volumes are all genuine I'm lost for words. You know as well as the rest of us that MM's have pretty much free reign to do as they will with movements and place the Bid/Ask anywhere they like. If you feel that there were genuine holders who let go of 20million shares, I can't say I agree with you. There could have been enough chancers who bought in to the last rise I'll grant you. the vast majority of shares are held by long termers IMHO

Begs the question, who freed up all those shares for Mr L to buy? Or did MM's sell shares they didn't have, and then got active on the boards to try to drive down the sp ?
Rhetorical question, I think I know the answer.
I also added a few.

No doubt you're feeling smug about depriving Provexis of the direct income, which would have increased revenues compared to the DSM shared fraction.

As a way to support your investment, it's an exercise on foot shooting IMO

There are only a few serious, long term, investors rather than traders.
Whereas the same few semi pro bashers keep reinventing themselves when their credibility falls below zero. That's what is happening to the current ones, because the few of us can identify them by their words and tactics, their problem is that nobody acts on their repetition. As far as the current ones go, think Muttleys.
There no opposite sides of the coin from these boring bashers. Those that saw no value have long gone. Those that see the developing facts of Fruitflow progress remain, and invest accordingly.
Then there's Pump, he just chirps like a budgie, pointlessly. Consistently inaccurate.