Member Info for alfista

And upcoming sales of "several hundred thousand pounds"

At least it ends the silence.

That's a highly selective view, overlooking the switch from IP holding alone to full commercial responsibility, which is still early doors, with other brands still adding Fruitflow offerings.

Clearly you are taking the mega gloomy position for reasons of your own, but it doesn't give a fair reflection of where we are. I believe that all long termers feel that we could be better informed, relying as we do on excellent research posted by gixer and several others. I'm really grateful for that.

Well, the cash call seems to me to have receded from " Nailed on" down to "possible" over a very long time now. Something must have changed in the financing requirements, other wise the cash would have been needed yonks ago. The company still awaits news from China that launch of multiple products, backed by the highly prestigious Blue Cap approval, is about to begin. The concern is that the state operates to its own timescale, and no-one

is able to influence that, If that launch requires a scale up of Fruitflow production, and if the cost of that has to be solely born by Provexis, then yes, cash would be needed, for the most positive of reasons . IMHO

Wonder what the trading sleuths make of that posted 0 share trade?

I wonder how our long term shorter is interpreting today's RNS.

I was just thinking back to the "research" that they published to back up their shorting, and how very damaging that was. Also the many aliases that appeared on this board backing up the expertise of Oilman Jim. How many sold and suffered genuine loss from that garbage?

I bought Cardio Flow before Provexis launched Fruitflow +O3, so it has been long established.

Purse strings have been tight drawn for so long, I'm assuming that production no longer requires a wad of cash. Hope so anyway.

It is Welly, you're quite right. And I'm sure I'm not giving away any confidences to say that I know he is committed to just that.

There must be quite a few of us who would increase holdings if we had just a bit more information regarding current state of the business. Can't ring up as rules forbid, so we have no choice but wait for news via RNS. Silence isn't golden in this instance.

I know I keep banging on about it, but each new health benefit identified appears to create an adverse reaction. Not a health reaction, because there are no identified adverse health effects attached to the taking of Fruitflow. The adverse reaction appears to be in the number of trades. Not only are no new buyers seeing the financial attractiveness of becoming a Provexis holder, but us existing holders are not adding. We need financial clarity about whether or not extra funding will be needed. This hiatus has gone on for far longer than it should have IMHO

Some explanation of whether supplies of Fruitflow are being delivered on a different basis would be really helpful, since the uncertainty regarding prodction funding has weighed heavily all year.

We need a reason to add/hold IMHO

That looks a very stiff interest payable, the cost of which will surely weigh heavily on future earnings.

Set against European producers becoming rapidly uncompetitive, proposed "carbon taxes" on energy consuming products, and continued consumer squeezing, I can't say I share the Boards confidence.

Time will tell

Stas. That theory would be all fine and dandy if the short hadn't been supported by a complete pack of lies.

Just saying.

Or...

"Always look on the bright side of life"

Cheer up y'old b........

In the unlikely scenario that we have become comfortably cash generative, which would arguably be a notifiable event, Provexis could restock for current demand without stress. A much more likely guess would be that the manufacturer is producing and stocking to supply as needed.

All guesswork, no data to work with.

The period has been so frustrating, If we had already had a funding, we would know where we stand to either take part in it, or add on a dip due to a discounted placing. Or, if we knew that an alternative route to stock funding had been implemented, and that current trading was cashflow positive, or at least neutral, then again we could add with a higher level of confidence.

The silence is harming us IMHO

Yet more positive PR coming out of China. It's good news, but it has zero effect on market sentiment here.

I suspect there are a few of us who would like to feel persuaded to invest a fair bit more here, but are held back by the perennial line in company udates suggesting that a further fundraising may be needed. This state of stasis has persisted for more time than I dare to consider .

Maybe this year?

We will have to agree to disagree on that point. They should never have been allowed to resume trading, the balance sheet had the most obvious massive hole that I have ever seen. Stevie Wonder would have seen it.

You were conned because you believed. You didn't have to follow the advice of anon. posters, you could have read the financials for yourself.

Then, with WRN suspended, they did the same again on a non market company, and again, some fell for it when they should have walked away.

The power of daydreaming.

It may be that Indena make something else for that company, and their PR people thought it would be prestigious to name drop a much marger outfit thatn Provexis.

I do respect that, I begged them not to.

The gang knew that the law is extremely lax in these cases, but buyers knew who the gang were. If they trusted a word that the gang uttered, more fool them.

Several posters tried very hard to dissuade, with predictable results

Some claim to have heard a voice from the heavens saying " Lend us a tenner and I'll pay you that fiver I owe you"

Not sure about it being temporary. it's a very normal way to do business in many supply situations, rather than extended credit. The manufacturer would need projected sales flow so that they could ensure constant availability of stock, they would add a bit to the price for the service. If they are a cash generative business, providing this sort of deal whilst enhancing margin would give a better return than leaving unused funds on deposit. But it doesn't help share values if we are in the dark about it. How long is it now that we have been holding back in the expectation of more dilution?