Member Info for alfista

Bingo !

Wish they'd stop hissing about with the tiny non trades.
A zero trade indeed.
Fake news

As far as we can see, the folks who did buy at that level haven't bailed out with their profits, presumably they are expecting a lot more. Scary to imagine what the multiples of that average could be, but fair play to them for waiting to invest when they did. I had a few, but not enough. Hindsight ehh !

All about perspective Naz.
You had the opportunity to buy at around a third of the current price. So did I.
So the share price has tripled for some, but all you do is moan. I wonder why.

The Mid hasn't been shown for 2 days, yesterday the false Ask was an A trade so this site showed it. Today the false Bid was an A trade. On Tuesday the Bid was .755 and the Ask .895. Still is

Price hasn't moved at all.

Certainly was

Did anyone else see that trade, before it vanished again? At .825

Again, not really.
You know about Fruitflow, so do I, and a gaggle of investors in Provexis. Fact is, the great unwashed don't, and I'm sure PR emails about stuff benefitting Covid sufferers are thick on the ground right now.
On 'tother hand, a ten million share trade doesn't come along every day of the week does it.

Well, not really.
Fruitflow hasn't got an official health claim registered yet for alleviating the effects of Covid. Only dot joiners, who see correlation between the effects on blood, and the ability of Fruitflow to address that, would be considering buying right now. The masses just don't have that expert view. So the effect on takings is unlikely to show up. The point of my last post was that, in my view, Covid is here in the long term, and so the development of commercial products making that health claim would still have a valid market long in to the future.
I wish that revenues could be the key that unlocks value here, but the launch of more products by stronger brands remains the best prospect IMHO

Anyone who has been watching medical opinions on Covid will appreciate that this dreadful virus isn't going to vanish. The limitations of vaccines is all to obvious, indeed some medics argue that it was the wrong approach to mass vaccinate because this causes mutations to appear all the faster. I don't know about that, only time will tell.
However, it does mean that products which can alleviate symptoms for sufferers will have a long term future The list of ailments which can be positively affected by Fruitflow has grown and grown.
All the more puzzling is the zombie market for shares right now.

Why would there be so many PMA's lately on such miniscule trades?

Never a truer word.

What you are calling for is just not practical, or sensible.
It isn't fantasy league, it's business. The agreement with DSM was for a term, entered in to 11 years ago, and with still some way to go. DSM will say that they have done their utmost to promote Fruitflow over the years, and the marketing efforts at countless exhibitions support that claim. A lot of brands have launched Fruitflow products, and continue to do so.
You thought you were going to make a quick gain, and you bought of your own free will, and you didn't sell, again your choice. Trying to knife the management will not help any of us IMHO

Fully agree with that sentiment, and all too aware of your previous comment about our own shelf life realities. I saw an interesting piece on MoneyWeek about AIM shares being treated more kindly on inheritance tax. Perhaps the next generation will view this as a wise choice, but don't think I'll hold my breath on that one.

I think you are missing my point there Krusty. Every one of us who put money in the AIM listed shares know that the risk is always present. There are many interpretations of the events of 2009. For sure a poster on here had an enthusiastic following of newbies, and perhaps CB was one of them. The original suggestion, that acquiring EFSA approval would unlock the potential, was a fair one, indeed the word transformational was stated. As with all things EU, the pompous authority claimed wasn't matched by the reality, having the approval did little to influence brands at a time that the largest companies were highly risk averse due to the market crash. We saw the first "know of no reason" RNS after the rapid rise. A market cap of £100m was hard to justify, and anyone who bought at that time wasn't too savvy. However, that warning did little to dent the over heating. So, we then had the infamous sell by the CEO, which did deflate many, and rightly so. Was that deliberate, did advisors decide it was the only way to restore some reality? That's possible IMHO but I've never discussed it with anyone there so it is only my speculation. The company spent raised funds on acquisition, I believe they had the business model that rising revenues from Fruitflow would fund the rapid expansion of the sports nutrition arm. When it became clear that insti investors were willing to fund the SiS business model, it was floated off and that's just what happened. Fruitflow continued to see brands launching products world wide, without very much of the revenue coming the way of the IP holder. We all knew that the Alliance deal was secret, many people left due to lack of transparency, a fair decision, and some remained trying to judge when, and how much, to pay for further holdings. Enter the group of backers who have supported further fund raisings. Some swore that they would not throw more more funds in, their choice. Others took encouragement from the backing of the rich lads, I'm only one. I don't think it's bragging, we all stand or fall on our own choices. I've had losses in other places, mainly resources, but I don't lurk on those boards trying to piddle on other's strawberry patch.
Each to their own choices, but moaning endlessly about them isn't on IMHO

The continual flow of information posted by gixer and others can only confirm that Fruitflow, far from being dead, is showing increasing potential. Who could have predicted ten years ago that, during a global pandemic, Fruitflow was being studied for it's efficacy in dealing with the worst aspect of the virus, aggravated platelets.
The perpetual critic is viewing things through the prism of his own disastrous choices to buy and sell when he did, failing to appreciate that others are in a far more positive place due to different investment decisions. Anyone normal would have moved on, but this character is aching for the company to fail for his own bitter reasons. Bad manners.

I wonder if this throws up the prospect of further research funding?

That wasn't the case around a year ago, for sure.

As far as I know, Mr Ford has been unable to return to his family in Oz for a long time, due to restrictions.
Particularly insensitive to him at this particular period IMHO