RE: Short Squeeze14 Oct 2022 12:35
You seem to be a bit obsessed with me, as if I was interfering in the desire to keep things uber positive on this chat board.
Never mind. If the situation is as you stated on your very first, ultra reassuring "statement" in support of the company, they why hasn't this explanation been issued by the company to the market.
We all have different criteria when judging the worth of investments, that's why there will always be differences of opinion. personally, a business based wholly on debt rings alarm bells, especially when a key person lives what can only be described as a lavish lifestyle.
The account given in the Iceberg report, which anyone can search for and read, is that the two acquisitions were, in fact, already owned by the company. Nothing you have written establishes anything different, so we'll have to continmue to disagree.
Finally, when you "appeared" on this chat board, you claimed that the shorters had better look out because a reversal was imminent. the quoted sp on that day was 477. Will you admit that you were highly irresponsible in encouraging buyers at that level?