Member Info for Alfacomp

Enerox have been making VRFB's longer than almost anyone else

mikeetg - the filling problem had nothing to do with UET.

I think a lot of the people posting today should really do a bit more research.

why would you presume that Enerox cannot build such VRFB's anymore ?

UET's sister company Rongke Power.

The same people who are building the Dalian battery.

It is not so complicated.

Apple102 - UET changed to their Reflex module sized system about 18 months ago - this is not dissimilar to the Invinity VRFB modules - i.e. less than the size of a container but big enough to still need a forklift to move around. The advantage of these is that they can be shipped already full of electrolyte.

The original UET battery under test was a container based system - which is exactly the sort of thing that you would like to be making really large installations out of - unless of course you really want to go the whole hog and build a fabulous building in the middle of a city to put the system in, and then you can dispense with all the cost and trouble of containerisation and simply install tanks and power stacks.

Anyway the point is that Eskom are going to want containerised systems, and they have already successfully tested a UET containerised system.

Well it was the UET mixed acid electrolyte but the one soon to be tested is the rongke power system, presumably using single acid electrolyte. Of course UET and Rongke are very closely related.

Sanchez - no they are simply trying to get cheap shares. They of course don't know anything about any of the businesses on the stock market.

What it takes is investors who know what their shares are really worth.

mogwhy - yep that manufacturing site is actually only about the same size as the 800mWh Dalian battery itself.

EarlofAim - you know precisely nothing about VRFBs

I on the other know enough to have helped break the transformation news about the Dalian battery earlier today - https://twitter.com/BMNperspective/status/1316350719230869505

Anyone who is seriously interested in Vanadium Flow Batteries can find out what they need to know on the Bushveld Perspective website https://www.thebushveldperspective.com/blog/public-articles-1/tag/vrfb-83

the 3D engineering model on this page shows how this VRFB can effectively get higher energy density (yes HIGHER ENERGY DENSITY) than a lithium ion battery system. There are tanks some 2-3 storeys high of electrolyte, with another storey of banks of power stacks that the electrolyte gets drawn up into.

The whole thing is inside a building the size of Trafalgar Square.

Slap bang in the middle of a city of 8 Million people.

Look here Lionel

https://twitter.com/BMNperspective/status/1316350719230869505

that building IS the battery

I told you you would not have long to wait.

Hazbeen - I was being generous saying that it was only 10 Million - of course 2 x 500 grand at 8p is 12.5Million shares to be accurate

Jonny_five - I am afraid that you are incorrect - average volume over the last 6 weeks has been 300k per day - so even if ALL the trades were buys of shares that would only shift 9 million shares

that is because they are flogging off the placing shares

thanks that has made my week.

Perhaps we can get back to talking about the 7.8 MWh of VRFB energy storage that our partner company Invinity has secured in recent Californian projects - https://www.energy-storage.news/blogs/solving-californias-energy-puzzle-vanadium-artificial-intelligence-and-ever

I'm not sure sloppy should be writing about sewage. Anyway it's just a pizza di story.

Anyone who wishes to understand the basic pricing of Vanadium can go to the website I curate here:- https://www.thebushveldperspective.com/vanadium-prices

You couldn't even bother to read that page and do even know the difference in pricing methodologies between V2O5 and FerroVanadium. I have had enough of trying to educate you - the simple fact is that you don't want to be educated because you are simply trying baseless ramping to sucker in new investors. Well good luck to you, but better luck to them. I'm not wasting any more time on you, but those others can go and find out more about the Vanadium sector here:- https://www.thebushveldperspective.com/blog/public-articles-1/tag/vanadium-81

yes you are incompetent.

Just because a feasibility study completes it does not mean that the SP immediately goes to that value. It all depends on how much dilution there is going to be before you even get close to building the mine - do you know how much the plant will even cost yet ?

Earl - do you understand that the ore is quoted at 24 Million tonnes ?

That ore is only 0.68% V2O5.

V2O5 is around $13,500 per tonne at present.

You are so incompetent that you cannot even multiply three numbers together.