RE: The big rise15 May 2024 08:43
Mary your calculation is misleading. Top slicing doesn't average down.
Let's assume that after selling @170p and 'averaging down to 30p' the share price price actually crashes down to 30p. You would expect to have made a profit on the first sale and no loss on the second sale, hence making a net profit. In reality you would have made no profits at all. Your cash flow would be:
-£10,000 from your initial purchase
+£8,500 from your first sale (5,000 x 170p)
+ £1,500 from your second sale (5,000 x 30p)
Adding up all figures your will end up with no net profits, you started from £10,000 and ended with £10,000.
You can argue that if after the first sale @170p the share price falls less dramatically, to 60p. Would that make you a 2x bagger in any way? This is your cash flow again:
-£10,000 from your initial purchase
+£8,500 from your first sale (5,000 x 170p)
+ £3,000 from your second sale (5,000 x 60p)
This time adding up all figures your profit is £1,500 of hard money in your pocket. 15% of your initial sum.
The only way you can average down is by selling high and buying back in low. By doing so your average would not go down as dramatically as you would expect though. Making an X bagger on a share that actually doesn't rise manifold, but simply traded in and out is a mammoth task that hardly makes you a multi bagger.