Member Info for Aldebaran

So put it on the avacta bored?

Everytime you guys moaning at me about talking about avacta yet you keep bringing it up.

Would you like me to explain why Tom is wrong, in detail, on here?

Also, do you know what he has said about HEMO lately?

He doesn't know his a r s e from his elbow when it comes to biotech. Good on gold stocks and stuff though.

Why would they go for STS when SGC is such a lower bar to jump over?

Of course they go for SGC. Then quickly expand of label useage. SGC is what they'll go for and rightly so

Emotional much?!

Pension investor why do you expect news soon?

We have absolutely zero transparency from the company on any timelines whatsoever. Could be tomorrow, could be next month.

As JHFH says though, invest in the dark, shut up and like it and praise Vlad or sell

Perhaps people are now starting to see my point.

This is the kind of RNS that excites retail. Don't get suckered in. This is what i call exit liquidity for those wanting OUT. Price inevitably going to fall right back

Its wrong BV but the FCA will do FA as ever. Without hughesy we'd be around 10p per share after the last raises. I dont really give a fk tbh as long as I get rich. I bet many feel the same

Explains the selling last week then. Should motor on now. Half expected this.

13m quid obviously

So avacta can keep patience on the verge of death alive for much longer in a much better QoL proven and sgc patience have no other options so this is a slam dunk approval from FDA. P1b patience give a better glimpse of HOW good it is. We already know its good.

Avacta need 13 quid and market cao is roughly 300m pounds. Its pennies. With the money secured the science can be reflected in the valuation. 3rd party confirmed via a deal would light this rockets engines but equally, just get a raise done with Hughes to satisfy heights and add 12 months to the, runway and this gets to a 1bn valuation by Christmas. Just get on with it avavta now. Its time. Its time it, is... time

This, bored is... funny af.

Soms nut job starts a thread about how he's trolled avacta out the blue, I step in and give ACTUAL ways to troll it better and you lot crying saying im talking about,, avacta!! Haha

Then JHFH to his credit once again tries to de escalate it all but instead of saying dont, dont deramp other shares. And leave it there which would have ended it. He goes on to say how hemo is less risky than avacta and hemo as more upside.

So.i correct him and once again, you lot crying cos im, talking about, avacta haha you couldn't make this up. All there in black and white.

Hemo has some great science and what I do like is the low share count. The car t is safe 100% otherwise it wouldn't be approved for pediatrics by FDA. 3 adults treated and do far so good. We dont know that much about its efficacy though you guys can cry all you like but, much more time and data is needed.

I was hoping for the trial to accelerate after p3 was given all clear after all this is what vlad said would happen with new manufacturing process but here we are over 1 month since p3 had all clear and nothing. Silence. Only 3 patients data to review with supposedly clean safety profiles yet its taking more than a month to give the ok, come on. We're is the urgency. We're is the drive, where is the plan ffs.

Need to get a move, on. Im seeing a commercial deal pushed fo Q2 at this rate and unfortunately we will need extra cash by Q1 from where somewhere.

I like you notposting. You call out the BS. Even mine :)

This bored as lost all objectivity btw. They're hopelessly in love with hemo and just want to log in and read about how great it is all the time rather than discuss all aspects of the investment case including technical analysis, emerging competing technology, comparisons to other small cap biotechs, valuations using DCF and risk etc etc..

I dont think their is a proper well rounded invested out the lot of them. Its just a fan club and that is to there own financial detriment

Erm are u lot daft? Don't answer.

I enjoying my days off log in here to see what is going on with hemo and some nut job as gone off on one posting about avacta. So I respond to that and now your all crying that I am talking about avacta?

😅

Also, absolutely fine for JHFH to say not interested, comfortable with HEMO and dont want to research fine. Understandable. But dont then, after doing zero research on the other company, start saying hemo has more upside and is less risky etc because you simply cant possibly no that. So it is misleading.

As I said its like thinking your, wife is most beautiful person in the word but you've never even seen another woman.

JHFH too much to deconstruct with that last post but your half right. I dont think you have a proper grasp of the upside of avacta but fine. Trust me when I say I have run calcs for both companies I believe hemo upside to be huge but avactas is bigger. Much bigger. Even though it starts with a higher market cap.

One thing id like you to clarify is how hemo is less risky than avacta?

Avacta use chemotherapy which has been proven and widely used since 1940's its well known and understood.

It is bolting that chemo onto a tiny micropeptide which makes it totally inert and that micropeptide only releases the chemo when it reaches a tumour. This delivery system is proven and has been proven time and time and time again over the past 4 years in almost 100 patients and animals etc... safely. Data released almost monthly, we know exactly how the patients are doing.

For example those with salivary gland cancer which has no standard of care once metastatic have seen a disease control rate of 91%. Ninety. One. Percent.

So the delivery system WORKS. The chemotherapy we already know works. Ifso facto. It's derisked. Now just needs proving in a wider patient population which are otherwise healthy. Note that approval for this drug in SGC would then lead to off label use for other relevant indications like breast in a heartbeat. Who wants to lose their hair and get heart poisoning when you dont need too anymore.

Now compare to hemo, a novel new treatment with only 3 patience treated to date. No idea how they're doing still, are they alive? When will we get the more detailed blood tests confirming if all traces of cancer have gone?

Out the two, which one is more risky? Try being honest with yourself for once and look at it objectively.

Once again, nothing wrong with hemo, it has HUGE potential and upside is obvious but you cant just keep saying its better than avacta without understanding both.

Its like saying your wife is the most beautiful woman in the world but you've never even looked at another woman. Whats the halm in doing some proper research into avacta while waiting for your millions here? Scared you might like what you learn a bit too much?

And as for cash hungry biotech like HEMO and Avacta and all the others, we all know you either give away rights or you get diluted its par for the course. Just need to trust management will make best choices. Avacta have a toxic CLN but it has largely been dealt with for the foreseeable if you read up in it. Hemo have tons of warrants (future placings) lined up. It is what it is. Both companies need cash and plenty of it. A placing in either doesn't phase me at all, as long as the science continues to deliver well all be laughing

Bythe way i dont mind u people trying to deramp avacta. Doing so you might actually learn a thing or 2. To do it properly you should be saying that avacta need 13m by January else they're out of cash and out of business. Who is going to fund them when all they do is make chemotherapy which is yesterday's technology. The world has moved on. Avacta are do desperate for cash, they sold their diagnostics division at a whopping great loss at shareholder expense. This is how desperate they are. The CLN is like a noose around the neck also.

I'd be saying stuff like that if you want to deramp properly.

Not some lazy, half assed 5m placing incoming nonsense lmao

The non-binding letter of intent? Are we talking about the same thing?

And no, that money is not guaranteed and if it does come it won't be soon enough to fund the ongoing cash needs of the business, especially if hemo take HG-CT-1 into p2 and want to progress CBR etc and 3.

I think it is you sir who needs to think before one posts.

Oh dear me you are not even deramping properly.

If avacta place and to be honest they might well do and soon. They need a lot more than 5m. I would estimate maybe closer to 20m is needed and the placing price would be between 55 & 60p.

The thing you dont realise is that a placing retains 100% of the platform so makes a takeover simpler and gives more upside to holders. Most holders actually WANT placing rather than giving away platform rights now lmao.

Hemos time will come that they need money, if HG CT 1 hasn't been commercialised and zero chance JHFH and his mates can find the amount required. I'd be very careful if I were you. People in glass houses and all that. Lol

Don't respond to the parasite Sheppy. Leave him to his views hes entitled to them. Even if they are wrong and repetitive.

I'd encourage everyone to ignore him actually. Like a toddler he'll soon get tired and cry himself to sleep

Do not engage with the parasite.

Have I talked hemo down? I like hemo i think it has HUGE potential. Ive made it clear hemo is undervalued AND ive proven it with risk adjusted DCF calculations. What more do you want from me?

I only jumped on about avacta because JHFH tried to say hemo is my biggest nest egg when its not by a mile

Also JHFH, please dont parrot Haywain. He has zero clue about Avacta either. And you say its still chemo, fine but there's nothing wrong with chemotherapy if there is zero side effects. Infact chemo is incredibly potent. Dosing has only previously been limited by its side affects which avacta delivery system has taken away. Tech applicable to 90% of solid tumours. 90. Percent. Do the math on that and then realise the drugs are ancient so already proven and the delivery system is proven over the past 4 years then work out a probability of success. Bish bash bosh, you do that and you'll realise why avacta has more upside and is more certaint than hemo.

I can confidently say that, why? Because ive researched both, in detail. You nor haywain nor any of the hemo ultras can say the same.

Once again though does not mean ur not onto a good thing with hemo because u potentially are.

I just dont like carp being spouted about how I am obsessed with hemo and its because hemo is biggest nest egg. Far from it. Far Far Far from it.

Have a good rest of your day