Member Info for AKHM

It is pretty obvious that all the projects are somewhat intertwined and that one trial will likely progress with the next and so on due to the nature of the industry. As they said numerous times they need to create the demand as well as develop infrastrucutre plans for if/when it all kicks off. This is a ridiculously ambitious and long winded process I would have thought and therefore the share has always been an all or nothing in my opinion. They are either about to drop some outrageously good news or we could get the opposite. Hoping we get the 4/5 RNS in quick succession soon though otherwise this will feel like another year wasted.

They probably haven’t in the last 6 months. We are clearly at a point just waiting on others to pull their finger out. The only thing I can see QED having total control over is the development of their B100 fuel.

Interesting in this RNS that they added the last paragraph this time stating that their holding has hugely increased as a result of them both actioning their options.

Will be interesting to see the share price reaction if we employ a CEO who may have been a director of one of the big oil majors. May hit 10p just on news of a high calibre CEO.

If the agreements are signed asap and trial actually starts the share price will be 10p minimum I would think.

Very good point Kolonik. It is a pretty specific job role/description which would seem very unusual if they were only trying to get the trial over the line first. Seems to be a lot more moving parts in the background that suggest QED are part of a far bigger operation here.

Last time we all had this conversation was all of last year when we were waiting for the tripartite agreement. It was explained by the fact the agreement had moved on significantly to a binding agreement rather than non-binding. Wonder if the same thing is occurring and they are actually working on a provisional commercial agreement now on the proviso that the trial data and LONO are completed without any issues.

Wonder what happened to the other big shipping company that we were told about and that was meant to be close to something significant

You would like to think they have been developing the B100 fuel as they haven’t had much else to do. Last year was almost a write off until the last month or two. Sadly this year needs to pick up or we will be much the same. I am still at a loss to why when we have a product that will soon essentially be mandatory and saves companies money is taking forever to expedite their trials.

The big rise was due to the tripartite agreement. The funding knocked us back 60%.

Isn’t not is!!

I hope they haven’t left Bernard in Morocco 👀 he must be getting bored senseless. Let’s be honest if MSC don’t use bioMSAR they are going to struggle with costs and emissions. Still struggling to work out why this is no.1 on their agenda.

The Morocco saga had become a joke.

It is one hell of a long time when you look at it and easy to see why as LTH we all get incredibly frustrated. Positive or negative comments are just investors venting or reassuring themselves. Ultimately potentially transforming a whole industry may be just worth the wait. Let’s hope it happens this year.

Very true. At some point it may be correct though!

Wrong board?

Fill ya boots I say. At some point this will go up and go up significantly. Good luck everyone hopefully we all want the same thing.

Or sorry the net increase in their share purchase I meant.

Correct. Really struggle with how the directors buying a lot of shares is a negative. Their net spend was pretty significant.

Totally agree SR, I had originally started my post saying that the volume was minuscule and largely irrelevant but thought I would be ragged out for saying such a thing. I was hoping you would cover that point off nicely 😉