RE: Serica14 Feb 2021 08:10
Speaking from the outside who sold out two years ago and now back in again I don't think they been lazy. Clearly they are looking for value and won't overpay. BP originally agreed to sell Andrew area and the Shearwater for $625 million to PMO, that deal eventually got reduced too $210 and still fell through. ENQ announced a purchase recently and no market reaction, I know they have other issues but the market doesn't think they got a great deal.
I like that they didn't take on debt to fund an asset for the sake of increasing production numbers. I'd rather they get the right deal and increase sp by 50-100% or if not available grow organically via R3, Columbus etc.
With BKR SQZ have proven they can take aging asset, reduce operating costs, reduce emissions, extend production life etc. With the focus on emission targets and the hype of renewable energy I feel majors now more inclined to sell of certain assets to help paint a transition picture for their institutional shareholders that they are transitioning to reduced carbon footprint.
I personally feel this is the year for a deal to be done, and if not the case then all good anyway as in Jan we're getting 100% cash flow from BKR. It's a win win for me and 12month hold to see what transpires.