Member Info for AIMinvestor22

Right on cue. Still bragging about wealth in 2026 despite being stuck in here since 2023. Price is nearly 90% down since they have been bragging about wealthy holdings here 🤪😂

I’ve never flaunted wealth, I’m happy with my small time trades and % returns here and there. It’s others that put themselves on a holders pedestal laughing at £2k trades despite being sat on 3 year 80% losses :-D

Self proclaimed holders with fingers on the pulse getting sell quotes I see.

Apparently unable to get shares on this one, yet the chat board is full of praise for a 2.6m buy.... lol

Can’t say I agree Ranger. Trump is many things, but no one could allow the Iran leader to carry on killing their own people and allow nuclear to be in the hands of the dangerous. This has been ongoing well before Trump.

For what it does for gold, he interesting how the market wakes up tomorrow am. Stay safe all.

Fergal I rated your comment this morning. Ranger has a habit of being controversial, whisky shouldn’t be mixed with an LSE board.

Why though do you keep trying to create some divide between “holders” and “traders”? You do know it doesn’t actually matter what the SP is for a trade right? If this rocketed to 1p we haven’t missed this make believe train. Can still throw in some investment as the price will always fluctuate at any level. Being locked in creates opportunity cost, but trading creates the market so not sure why there’s so much hatred?

If it does though jump up levels, will you be selling - i.e. meeting the definition of a trader? And your target SP just hasn’t yet been met? Or are you planning on holding the share indefinitely like some sort of trophy?

Contrary to what you think, I actually do hope this rockets for you for some decent returns as the post this morning came across genuine. I only ever look to question RNSs in a critical manner but holders never seem interested and turn to abuse.

Have a good weekend

Helx is actually hilarious. Bringing morals into this is pure comedy. "Morals" for questioning timelines that have been quoted. The price didn't drop 10% on opening because of users in a forum questioning it.

But, morals are seemingly ignored when they persistently bombard the forum that "you'll make multiples from this...".. "wouldn't want to be out of this over the weekend". The same narrative for three years and it's down over 80%! I wonder how many sideliners were caught out having a punt based on their comments.

Not to mention that their Phase 1 calcs are completely flawed. Quotes revenue as net profit for a start. And assumes that the plant will be in full flow on day 1.

Exhibit A: below posted when the price was 0.75p...

Helx2

Posted in: NTVO

Posts: 3,544

RE: 1M Block Buyer13 Aug 2025 08:54

Agreed - i think the next few hours might be the last time to get in before 1p. mm games / shaking being played (like we've seen every morning across the last few trading days).

Fair enough, Ice. If asking about timelines on a forum designed to discuss company ongoings is cluttering the BB then I'll leave you to it and wish you all the best. Perhaps practice what you preach though on clogging up the board as many genuine NTVO holders have stated on other forums they've set this one aside because of ai drivel.

Iceman I can wholeheartedly tell you I have only one account here 😂 I’m not desperate, I’m openly discussing the timings as it confused me. Yeah in small caps, especially mining, delays are inevitable.

But to quote in an official RNS that starting works were imminent and then 3 months later they haven’t actually appointed a contractor is not “front running good news”. How could the works have been imminent if they hadn’t actually agreed terms (which gave them the rights to manage the GOPP) with the owner until now? The construction is estimated to be $1.8m. What terms were agreed with the previous owner for ownership?

It’s a genuine question in case I’ve understood it incorrectly.

I wasn't even trying to be controversial. The Nov-25 RNS, and at the webinar, they stated that contracts for civil works was imminent. At the end of Feb-26 they say that three potential contracts are under close consideration by Nativo. Are these separate things?

Iceman... many accounts? Which other accounts are mine LOL

Why don't you address the quotes I raised instead of getting edgy.

Whether I intend buy any is my business... It's good to get an understanding of expectations on dates for entry/exit points ;-D

Have they mentioned any terms agreed with other nearby miners considering the CEO quoted* that the vast majority of gold processed at the GOPP will be from third parties, not actually from NTVOs own mining?

*Webinar on YouTube around 26mins

Nov-25: "In addition, the Company will imminently be awarding a contract for the following civil works which are due to commence in late November 2025"... "We look forward to commencing civil works on site and formalising the equipment orders in the coming weeks."

Feb-26: "The engineering, procurement, and construction ("EPC") of the GOPP will be undertaken by a specialist contractor. Three potential contracts are under close consideration by Nativo, and the Company will provide an update in due course once an EPC contractor has been appointed."

So the update in Nov-25 about commencing works was said before final contracts had been signed with the owner of the part-built GOPP? Interesting.

Iceman - think you need tell your own holding clan the definition of nice, not myself. I commented on the X post about the deployment of buckets being news worthy (which surely even you can see is quite funny) and beesting69 hurled abuse. I'm obviously not the only one who thought so as their comment has been taken down.

Everything ok Beesting? Who rattled your cage? How is it childish to ask why a mining company is posting that they’re deploying buckets? 😂 I know you’re holding but some critical thinking might help!

What % gain is 0.5635p less 0.435p?

Great update indeed. Really good to hear 2 weeks after the RNS that they are deploying mining buckets.

I'm far from a mining expert but come on LOL that's like a new finance company saying they're deploying excel for their day to day ops!!

Fergal, yes each to their own. If it wasn't for "traders" (you all are unless you're planning on holding forever and including NTVO shares in your Will to your beneficiaries! LOL).

It may well go parabolic on news, but I'm a cash in hand kind of guy and prefer short term investments especially on start ups. Based on expectations raised by yourself and others, there'll be plenty of opportunities to temporary join the ride up to oblivion.

Which naughty individual didn't like my comment and reported and removed it about CLNs due at 0.51p?

“beesty69”. Not a good one? Please explain as I just made 30% in a week on this, not bad and now it’s already invested elsewhere. You keep topping up and accumulating fees though bravo 👏

Sooner than you think guzzler looking at the sell quotes 👀👍

"Have been" is not technically past tense; it is the present perfect tense of the verb "to be". It describes actions or states that began in the past and continue to the present, or actions that happened at an unspecified time in the past but have a connection to the present.

*2nd bit of Gold ;-)