Member Info for AIMinvestor22

Rosty yes I seen that, that’s when they get the GOPP. But my understanding is that the profit margins aren’t as high for that amount of throughout as a significant amount of the gold to be processed at the GOPP will be from 3rd parties in the area (quoted in the webinar).

30oz a day? Where is that figure from please? That is 850g of gold per day. If that’s at the average 15g/t, that is 56tonnes shifted per day.

I apparently meet the description of a numskull, according to Helx, but I’ve had replies in the past. Maybe they don’t care, or from an email don’t actually have a clue who is who.

Lots of self soothing/reassuring posts today. No doubt the drop will somehow be because of pesky naysayers.

That SteveE gets a lot of stick for how they post, but seems to have called it about opportunities potentially arising in the 0.3s. Expecting a tr1 from Helx by month end……

You seemingly, or purposefully, forgot to copy the whole post.

Wink wink implied sarcasm.

As our chief tr1er who all the minions look up to, any comments on the samples?

Carefree - where did I say anything about today’s spike?

I said I was going to hold off, and HL currently has a bid of 0.452 so yes, avoiding was the right choice.

If you don't want to discuss RNSs and factual data provided to try target spikes and make profit, then feel free to green box me.

If, however, you want to mute sensationalists such as Helx who is trying to mislead sideliners by repeatedly claiming 1p and beyond, then filter option is highly recommended.

Iceman, have you reviewed the data provided in table 2? It gives a breakdown of the samples. Only 3 samples (6946, 6917 & 6919) were above 5g/t. Based on the data in table 2, a total of 54m was sampled. Of which, 53m ranged from 3.3g/t and below.

Golf - we all know what Q2 means. If they meant April they would say April.

Thanks for confirming, iceman.

So to clarify, they’re targeting 3 ore shoots (the 3 samples that came in above 5g/t), but the other 95% of bonanza are below 5g/t.

If I wasn’t providing context, can you please for everyone else? From what I have read, previous sampling was vein only whereas these results are systematic sampling which has proved there is a lot of barren rock.

Iceman, what I have posted was a direct copy and paste from the company RNS, table 1 and table 2. So if you say it is misleading, then are you saying the RNS is misleading? Of the 147 taken, 100 samples were taken from widths greater than the 0.28m.

We have been told that grades averaged 15g/t which is what most in here have used in calcs as a basis for estimated revenue.

Fergal no need to play victim now. You came at me because I quoted the new sample figures saying “bless you” etc. Once again I’m not creating FUD, I’m discussing the RNS.

95% of the ore sample is below 5g/t. One anomaly in the data is 41g/t. The extraction was 0.28m for the anomaly whereas most other samples were above this. I asked if you were looking at the same data and another account replied directly to me in the same tone🤷🏻‍♂️😂

Correct account this time Fergal 😀

Guzzler, who are you referring to? I haven’t seen any large sells posted.

Still get a spike though guzzler wink wink

Fair enough Fergal. Was just strange that a new Bonanza account replied to my direction question to Fergal 🤷🏻‍♂️😂

Fergal, there’s nothing dangerous about not losing money..

Bless you? Out of 147 samples, just one 28cm ore contained 41g/t. 95% below 5g/t.

What’s the trimmed mean? I thought it was previously 15g/t

Did you just accidentally reply on the wrong account, Fergal?

Fergal, are we reading the same data? Which bit said even higher grades than before? The table(s) show that 95% of the samples below 5g/t, with 90% below 1g/t. The 41g/t (lower than previous estimated high of 60g/t) was taken from a 28cm ore according to the table.

SteveE - this isn't a place to discuss the company performance, it's to let everyone know what you've bought and sold :-D

Congrats

Helx2 posting about someone with multiple accounts? The hypocrisy. Those who remember they accidentally posted LSE L2 data on their non-premium account…. How’d they manage that? ;-)

In regards to losses, it’s been posted many times on here that their average price is well over 1p. Those who remember chadster (tr1 holder) - Helx claimed to be just below them in terms of % holding here at the time. Probably explains all the fomo they try to create to get that price up for some recovery. Any genuine discussion about the company delays and they get in a hissy fit.

One trade of £1k 6 months ago and they think they know about someone else’s wealth 😂😂.

If someone with wealth sticks a £10 on a horse, does that make them poor?