Member Info for AHP007

I emailed Companies House to object to the strake off and i am awaiting response.

I also email the The Insolvency Service to enquire how there investigation was proceeding. Which i asked for back in 2019
There replay was that the case has been closed and no further action is going to be taken.

So without that ongoing case, this time around Companies House can not stop it, as they only follow there procedures for late fillings

As regards to any assets, they would have been redistributed or transferred brfore New Day Asset Management Limited decided to get compulsory strike-off. Yes it was a choice, they choosedOtherwise at the point of strike-off all goes to the Grown

The Bid is 1.00 the Ask is 1.50. So the spead is 50%

s7molloy, Most of the SP movment is due to Share Consolidation. The spread is 50%. So if you buy now and sell straight away, you will lose half your investment

There is NO investigation into Worthington Group.

Even the FCA told you this in a email "I contacted the FCA and they sent me a reply today saying they are not aware of any investigation into Worthington Group"

You got it from the horses mouth

Re JumpTheBandwagon

Good luck to you but you should never borrow money to Gamle on AIM.

The reason its cazy AIM is because most companies do not pay dividens and AIM is a news driven market, so people move there money around and Gamble on the next peice of news

Harts, These where not cancelled transactions or delayed trades. They where just late reported. If you check trades at the time you will see identical trades going through
10-Jan-20 08:36:06 9.95 100,000 Buy* 9.50 10.20 9,950
10-Jan-20 08:18:28 10.07 150,000 Buy* 9.80 10.10 15.11k
10-Jan-20 08:13:33 9.94 150,000 Buy* 9.54 10.10 14.91k
10-Jan-20 08:04:45 10.007 125,000 Buy* 9.32 10.10 12.51k

These trades where rollovers, where the T+ Dates is extended when the shares are sold and brought back at the same time.

https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/7-100-9529?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true&bhcp=1

https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/what-do-t1-t2-and-t3-mean/

Yes this AIM which is a news driven market, plus most retail traders on here are Gamblers and looking for there quick fix and that is why most Company Shares on AIM to not hold there value. Most do not pay any dividend, this is why people move there money around while they wait for the next piece of news to hit

Nothing to do with MM. It is at the moment more people are selling than buying. If i was a MM and people are selling, why would i offer a higher price. You only offer a higher price when the sellers dry up and you need to encourage people to sell

At the moment there is not a strong buy pressure on the share price, hence only 1.5%+

The de-risking and popularity of the Guyana Basin has also been assisted by the fact that Tullow Oil of the United Kingdom has also successfully drilled two wells near to Exxon’s Stabroek Block in recent weeks. It plans to sink several more exploratory wells in the new year. Similar plans are in train by Repsol of Spain and CGX Energy of Canada whose concessions are close to the Suriname border

http://amsterdamnews.com/news/2019/dec/26/guyana-cusp-becoming-oil-producer/

https://www.energyvoice.com/oilandgas/americas/214570/exxonmobil-discovers-more-oil-off-guyana/

https://total-market-solutions.com/2019/12/17/malcy-talks-oil-gas-xvii/ AAOG from 38 Min

TLW are down because of a HSBC downgrade.. not because leaks from Carapa (Bloomberg) -- HSBC analyst Swarup Bhattar cut the recommendation on Tullow Oil Plc to reduce from hold. PT set to 50 pence, implies a 26% decrease from last price. Tullow average PT is 104.81 pence.

TLW are down because of a HSBC downgrade.. not because leaks from Carapa (Bloomberg) -- HSBC analyst Swarup Bhattar cut the recommendation on Tullow Oil Plc to reduce from hold. PT set to 50 pence, implies a 26% decrease from last price. Tullow average PT is 104.81 pence.

I made a complaint to https://www.insolvencydirect.bis.gov.uk/ExternalOnlineForms/CompanyComplaint.aspx and they are now looking into the matter. Please all shareholders follow the link above and make a complaint too. Maybe for once us shareholders will get some recourse

11/12/19
Dear Mr Petri,
Re: WHETSTONE CAPITAL GROUP PLC
Thank you for your complaint about the above company, which we received on 2
December 2019.
Our decision
We have decided that we will look into your complaint in more detail before making
a decision.
How we will reach our decision
We’ll look at your complaint, the information you gave us and any other information we
have to decide whether we have enough grounds to investigate the company.
Further contact
If we need any more information we’ll contact you. However, we will only contact
you if we need more information.
Our investigations are confidential, so we cannot tell you if we’re investigating the company
or what we find if we do investigate. However, where we can we will tell you the outcome of
the investigation, for example where an enquiry results in no further action by us, th

no i agree with you, us shareholders will not get anything back. Each year that has gone by the pot as been eaten into by Legal and Liquidation fees. When this started they where talking about 200+ Million of Rangers Assets, now they are talking about returning a few Million. The Worthington pension deficit was at least 5M. Shareholders are always last in the queue unless you hold warrant and other securities

Yes it is and the only real way to know is, if Britdaq matched bargain platform released the names of the sellers of the 500,000+ Shares

Nothing because unless their is a detailed investigation you will never get to the truth. With resources in the UK stretched in all government department its very unlikely anyone will investigate because the costs outweigh the rewards of a successful prosecution. Simple fact not big enough.

look at HMRC you can open a company run it for a couple of years, pay no tax then get struck off but the chances of HMRC chasing you for the money is very low as they do not see it as cost effective

Yes i do think they where involved and i do think they new what was going on. Otherwise why let a company you hold 75% in get struck off when according to their own accounts dated 02 April 2019 they have over £400,000 in assets but the only thing they have invested in is Whet?