RE: IS HURRICANE TO CHEAP ?7 Mar 2020 01:30
MCB55,
" The wells productivity and flaring constraints will be clearer at the CMD I feel sure!"
Let's hope so!
I'm only just back home, picked up on this correspondence, so very quickly opened my copy of the EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) document to see if there are any figures there that may help. It was only a very quick glance, mind: I have to go to bed sometime!
But my overall impression is that there are just too many variables in play to be able to deduce whether the FPSO can flare with up to 30,000 bopd passing through, or whether 20,000 is currently some sort of limit for that reason.
For starters, I don't think we've seen a figure for gas / oil ratio at these flowrates, and without knowing that we can only be guessing. Also of course, flaring will be significantly reduced once the vessel is running fully on produced gas going through the gas turbine generators. Again, I don't recall having seen any company info as to whether those systems are yet fully commissioned or not.
I also found a snippet I hadn't really taken notice of before, in section 10.6.3 'Future possible export of gas'. Quote:
'Based on conversations with BP [my insert; nevertheless this was some years ago], it was understood that there would not be sufficient capacity in the WOSP system for Lancaster gas, due to high predicted production rates from the redeveloped Schiehallion and Loyal fields. Similarly, while an export line from the Rosebank development could present an option, the project is currently on hold. To keep up to date with any changes and to move forward with potential options in the future [ie now!], Hurricane will maintain communication with the respective field operators throughout the EPS phase [which is of course ongoing]. '
Which makes things all sound rather 'fluid', and maybe the WOSP tie-in shouldn't be considered a foregone conclusion.
As you say, MCB, hopefully some light will be shed on the situation at the CMD.