RE: Submerged Buoy Recovery6 Feb 2019 19:19
OMG. I'd intended to take some time out, but now can't having seen the 'tech discussion' continuing...
I applaud Wellwell for having re-posted links to a couple of photos at 12:03. For the sake of the 'newcomers', who now seem to be numerous. And his choice of photos was judicious.
The one of the 'test-fit' on the Dubai dock is the only inside view of the turret we have, and the latching mechanism. Note the guy leaning on the 'ring'. Now Look at the other photo of the buoy complete. Look at the 'ring' on top, and think back to the other picture. The size of the bloke? Now, you might start getting an idea of the scale.
SG2: "....... Otherwise, derisible engineering. Sorry folks."
Sorry, SG2, but that doesn't wash, for me. It isn't.
fitguy2: "Surely they had a load indicator?"
Yes, surely there must be one. It's inconceivable ( unimaginable / out-of-this-world / utterly mad) that some sort of load indicator isn't built-in.
In today's ongoing discussions, I feel that a few possible factors have been ommitted. And although such discussions won't change anything, I feel it heartening to see that quite a few people are interested in the 'tech' side. So I'd just like to throw a few more ingredients into the pot.
(a) This is not a 'routine operation'. In fact, it's only been done once before with this vessel, on Ettrick, about ten years ago.
(b) It's doubtful that the people involved at the moment are all the same 'team' who did that, back then.
(c) (More technically), it strikes me that as soon as the buoy is up into the latching position within the turret, you latch it! No standing around looking at things. No dingdongs from HSE having a conference. Did this happen?
(d) Nobody has yet mentioned the possibility of 'human error'.
(e) On Monday I made the mistake of floating the idea that maybe they were using an 'old' pull-in 'rope'. I've realised that was stupid. Of course it was a new one. But where did it come from? If it was made in China, take the SWL and multimply it by zero point five. And use the test certificate as bog-paper.
(f) Don't accuse Dr Trice of 'misleading us' with his mention of two metre swell and six hours. He's a geologist (+) and a businessman, and was just repeating Bluewater's optimistic stuff. Which we now see is incorrect. Maybe 'start pull-in to latching is just 6 hours, but there's lots of faffing-around involved beforehand.
(g) (Repeat) Neil Platt has nothing to do with the nuts-and-bolts of this operation.
But I'm sure all involved, especially Bluewater are far more aware of this than any of us!
They simply can't afford to get it wrong next time, so will be brainstorming the thing from all angles to sure to get it right.