Member Info for addicknt

RT, now that would be really annoying!

Orthern, I agree Vujcic's vow of omerta is galling, but how do we know the business itself is failing?

As yet, the milestones have not been missed and for all we know we could be on target and within budget ( the recent cash raise was almost certainly for general opex purposes and not related to the ongoing work on Cascabel)

It may also be the case that Vujcic is heavily engaged in discussions relating to those outlined in his original statement, but have not yet reached a conclusion and therefore he can't say anything. This seems quite likely to me.

Yes, the whole thing is bloody frustrating, but it seems to me we need to give the bloke some time to produce something tangible.

It's clearly going to be a close run thing, but you should be wary of the CEPR as they are a left-leaning and self-described progressive organization. Not exactly natural bedfellows for Nobby.

Pbow, interesting article.

If someone is going to buy the holding company, it's to be hoped they also want to get their hands on our investment in the subsidiary. We could do with the cash.

RR, I certainly share your view of the BoE.

Maybe you think the points you made in your second post are a good thing? If so, there's no contradiction. However, most people may not see things quite as you do.

RR, don't you see the contradiction in your posts?

What a ray of sunshine you are.

Trump blinks. Markets recovering.

KRSS, how is it linked to an equity raise?

Josepi, interesting point about salaries. The company haven't bothered to tell us about the package Vujcic and Smith were given, which is pretty inexcusable. Unless of course, they know we're about to exit are and doing it for nothing!

Hfm, the availability of tranche 2 is described as being in Q2 this year. So, as it stands we're not running behind schedule. Mind you, an update on progress would be helpful.

Pbow, thanks for posting. It's encouraging to read that both sides are committed to mining, although the electoral pact with the indigenous groups is a concern. This shouldn't affect Cascabel and we have been reassured repeatedly that none of our our concessions are in protected areas.

On a separate matter, a few people on here have raised the question of Administration...again. We've discussed the question of whether Jiangxi would invest against this backdrop - they wouldn't, but how about DGR?

If we were heading for Administration, Mather would know about it. In which case why would he risk a significant amount of his own cash backing DGR?

Obviously, it improves his security position, but he would still rank below FN and Osisko in the event of a distribution via an administrative process and would face the prospect of a significant loss.

12bn? Government officials seem to have a habit of coming up with some strange figures.

Bozi, to be fair, we don't know what he's up to because he's refusing to communicate with anyone. But I doubt he's just sitting on his a5se scratching his head. At least I hope he isn't!

Fort, assuming the rumour that Turner has been appointed is true, it suggests something is happening right now. You don't appoint a lawyer until they are needed - they're far too expensive for that! Of course, we have no way of knowing what he may be working on, but it has to be something.

I have responded. The fact you don't understand the definition of a lie is your problem, not mine. So I'll ask you again; are you alleging he was knowingly and deliberately telling us something which was untrue and he did so for the purposes of deceiving investors?

If you are convinced of this, report the matter to the relevant authorities.

Nal, lying: Stating something which you know to be false with the intention to deceive.

Are you alleging Caldwell was deliberately trying to deceive shareholders? If so, you may wish to refer the matter to the FCA.

Nal, unfortunately your inability to comprehend things reveals itself. If you break that statement down sentence by sentence maybe, just maybe, you'll realise why it contains no lies. So, if that's the best you can come up with, I suggest you rein back a bit with the accusations.

Nal, genuine question: what lies did Caldwell tell us?

Vujcic: I imagine a fair few people have emailed him in recent weeks. Has anyone had a reply, or even an acknowledgement of your correspondence?