Member Info for addicknt

Nal, your post demonstrates a couple of things:

1) You know nothing about me - although you regularly pretend you do.

2) What a total twat you are. What kind of weirdo would consult A1 for something like this? Mind you, I very much doubt you're able to use A1, although god knows you could do with some help - wherever it comes from.

Btw, I haven't forgotten your brilliant statement about trades vs shares traded. Even by you own lamentable standards that was a new and highly amusing low point. What was it? An average of one million daily trades for Challenger? Interesting, given Shell has only managed 7,500 so far today.

Fort, to be fair their track record on releasing the MD&As has been good and they're under no obligation to publish them earlier. Still, it gave you an opportunity for a good rant.

But you're right, the cash burn will be of great interest.

Winnie has added another update today.

Is due either tomorrow or Friday.

Covgaz, please accept my apologies. It was an error of judgement and won't happen again.

Erm...?

I take it you realise the figures you've quoted are the number of shares traded, not the number of trades?

FYI, 2.3m shares were traded in Lundin yesterday compared with 2.2m here.

RT, it's not the factual accuracy I'm concerned about, it's the inferences you are making.

Eloro, agreed. More convoluted conspiracy stuff.

As you say RT, what he did was necessary. But just because he was previously involved in a turnaround which required radical action, this in no way implies a pattern of behaviour which will be replicated here. 2+2 =5?

CMG, sorry, but it's true. Just read some of the stuff on here.

I'm afraid it's true, as we witness on this board every day, and that's undeniable.

RT, you described them as 'real concerns', which to me suggests they are coming from people who may know something. Private investors concerns are often unfounded with no basis in fact.

RT, I share your views about this type of funding, but you say 'concerns have been raised'. May I ask by whom?

IP, what exactly do you mean? Do you understand what a scrip issue is?

Given that I very much doubt they're strapped for cash, I'm sure they can struggle through the month.

On a serious note, I do think it's remiss of the company not to tell us what DV is earning, although this detail should appear in the next MD&A. I look forward to seeing you explode all over the screen.

Fort, you can guarantee they're working on it. We've had two good announcements and there will be more to come. Give them a chance.

Eloro, neither this licence nor the AIPA just magically appeared under the new regime. They are the result of months of work by the previous management.

Btw, can you name a management team which doesn't get a salary? Or do you expect them to work for free?

Given that the regionals currently have no value attributed to them, a way to make some cash is to buy our shares now and wait for what will effectively be a scrip issue of shares in ExCo when it lists. Flog the shares immediately and pocket the profit.

Scrat, I can't see how it will be a wholly owned subsidiary. It needs upfront investors and they will obviously want equity.

ExCo will indeed become a reality, and proof, if proof were needed, that Porv will be at its heart.

I wonder how far down the track they are with finding investors?

I suppose the questions is; will ExCo simply be a subsidiary company, or will they list it? I sincerely hope it's the latter.