RE: Newcrest and BHP VIEW13 May 2020 08:03
copperpot, I'm sure you're correct to think Mather has bent over backwards to appease the government, despite this not being part of his nature. However, I'm not sure I agree with your point about the majors.
It may have been accurate years ago, but they've all had to change the way they do things and are now every bit as solicitous as anyone else. They know which side their bread is buttered.
The other point is a more practical one. I'd bet the government would be perfectly happy with a major taking this on. It would guarantee production will happen and would almost certainly mean it would be done quicker and without the problems a small business is bound to encounter. In other words, they'll start getting tax revenues much earlier, and after all, this is the only thing they're interested in.