Outlook14 Jan 2016 12:36
From what I can gather the change to Grant Thornton was an upgrade and should be viewed as a positive. Logically Porta needed an auditing firm that could keep pace with its footprint and growth, and I don't think Smith & Williamson had the size or reach to be able to do that, hence the change to GT. It would make sense to move at this time so that GT had access to, and were fully involved with the end 2015 audit allowing S&W to finish off any outstanding housekeeping items. I think that the appointment of Steffan has given an invigorated sense of direction and purpose to Porta since his appointment. The almost co-incident mandate from multi-billion dollar Glencore in October probably highlighted the need for a more visionary approach based on growth trajectory. That would focus on auditors with sufficient 'reach' and kudos, and the means to continue growth and expansion.
I also suspect that the spotlight is now well and truly on Sanlam. We need a Nomad/Broker who can really grasp the mettle and appreciate the prospects unfolding in Porta. Sanlam have been singularly underwhelming and lacked focus and drive. I fully expect that ironically, Capital Access will be the Q1 2016 driver of institutional interest which will highlight the need to review Sanlam and look for a more proactive player.
As you point out [and also DW alluded to], the need for creative acquisition whilst the shareprice is low is paramount. Taking Capital Access into Skylight Tower in exchange for a shareholding was inspired and will pay off handsomely since we can increase from current 30% holding in 2017 [if we wish].
I re-iterate the fact that Porta, much to the credit of DW, have never offered shares under par-value 10p for any acquisition, and I expect that to continue.
Since we have had no RNS to the contrary since the interims in September, I am confident that Porta have continued to grow. DW stated "Our integrated product mix should ensure a better than average sector performance in the short term, and the recent new business wins across the group, coupled with the successful reorganisation programme is expected to result in another strong EBITDA performance in the second half of the year." That's now in the bag and Grant Thornton can give Porta the thorough maiden audit that should accompany either loan note debt renegotation [or even partial retirement against improving cash-flow].
As you point out, a range of legacy and start-up costs which have eaten at the bottom line, have now fallen away and y/e 2016 should provide a very 'clean' accounting year. Another reason why I suspect GT has been engaged.
I am sure that the vigour of Steffan and the seasoned guidance of David will be seen as a winning combination as the New Year progresses.