RE: Wishbone Gold BEFORE @Hole 1 Assay. Mon, 20 Oct 202520 Oct 2025 20:05
@news
First of all, you're making a calculation that's correct, but you're using the wrong numbers and apparently without considering whether the result actually matches what can be seen on the ground.
Your calculation:
TOTAL DISTANCE:
Hole 2 is 2 km from Hole 1. Hole 3 is 1.6 km = 3.6 km vs. Havieron's 3.5 km continuity-proven [expert requires to see continuity as the norm].
When I ask you about this because I haven't read anywhere about a 2 km distance between the new boreholes, you quickly say it's a typo. Then you say you actually copied a typo from me, which is on a satellite photo of Red Setter in a post I made on X.
But where does that 1.6 km come from? Right, from Wishbone Gold's October 17 RNS.
"Diamond drilling on hole 2 (25RSDD002) was completed at 950m and has now moved to a planned 500m deep drill hole (hole 3) located 1.6 km north of holes 1 and 2."
So I copied that from WSBN, and so you're now claiming that Wishbone Gold actually has a TYPO in their RNS or that they made a mistake.
Appears I COPIED YOUR "MISTAKE = TYPO" isn't it?
Indeed, I know the distances, but apparently you don't. You just write whatever you want, and when you're challenged about it, you start defending yourself with all sorts of strange claims.
Nevertheless, I appreciate many of your posts, but if there are incorrect calculations or something like that, I will respond. The main goal is to inform people with the most accurate information possible. And in this case, your calculation was correct, just based on incorrect data.
DYOR
GLA
Sign In
Follow the stocks
