Member Info for A_E_Marsh

"I think £35 is optimistic in the short term given the share price today is £14.25. "
I've been here since 2014 so the short term isn't an issue for me.

I don't know why you are rating the value of the company on the present share price in light of recent activity, that's what they want you to believe. Still, good for you, if that's what you want.
What bad news has caused the price to drop so spectacularly? Are BOOM suddenly running at a loss? Have they lost a lot of clients? Has the revenue stream dried up? Are the overheads unsustainable?

No to all of them. As I have said, since the latest information things have only improved for BOOM if anything and the full potential of the company is still yet to be realised. Especially in view of the economic situation and BOOM's operating structure.
I think if I had as little faith as you I would have sold the lot. At least then you wouldn't have the worry. There seem to plenty wanting to buy. Why do you suppose that is? Perhaps tomorrow you can have a good day when sells outnumber buys, for once.
Apt name, BTW.

My guess is I want £35 minimum. It's what was reckoned earlier as value of the company and nothing has changed, or if it has AudioBoom has actually got stronger in the interim.

I will probably vote against anything less. All IMO. I do want to pick up 10,000 at 200p though. I can't afford it at 800p!

We'll only know if it's working when we come to offer price. IMO, let's make no mistake, this is virtually certainly pre-take-over activity, if "they" can get what "they" want.
I think it is working (for us). The amount of buys are the proof of this, they are fighting an uphill battle. We know the value of this company and I think most will not be moved by some derisory offer.
Yeah, they're looking strong at the moment, and with help they can go part of the way.
But it is looking increasingly difficult.

After all, are you "spooked"? I'm damned if I am! All I'm looking for is more buy-in.

It seems that way. Yesterday buys exceeded sells by 33 per cent, 74,000 sells, 104,000 buys, and the price was driven down by 10 per cent. The same it appears, is happening here today. I've been in this company since 2014, so nothing new here. Personally I believe it is being led by a company driving the price down to put in a ridiculously low bid offer.
This is also what happened to this company in 2014 into 2015 and longer. Partly helped by some inept decisions by Rob Proctor, IMO,It took about 5 years to recover then.
Simply make the most and get in when you think it's at its lowest. I have no idea when that will be but I won't be buying anything above 800p and I'm looking (optimistically) for 200p. Meanwhile I'm sitting on my hands and letting the little savages run riot.
That is simply my new target price. It may never reach it but I have seen more than enough shenanigans here, led by the likes of that winnifrith thing to know anything is possible. And he does have a nasty little chip on his shoulder re: boom.
It dates from when Proctor was supposed to appear at his pizza parlour but he sent somebody else, an idiot director IIRC, and Proctor went to China instead!

Don't forget folks... at some point SHORTS HAVE TO CLOSE!!

Buys now same as sells, that explains the eight per cent drop.

"The cure will be worse than the ailment."

LOL. Love it. It's becoming more familiar than "What up, Doc?"

""Putting your head in the sand will only get you run over...""

Plus which, unseen people may touch parts of you that you would rather they didn't and you won't even know who they are! Very distressing, thanks for the reminder.

So you reckon they are not in talks and a director is still buying shares "despite" that?
It confirms confidence in the company too.

Perhaps you don't want to recognise that though????

"It’s like he responded to my comment!"

Could be. Although I think he was probably waiting for what he thinks is the bottom to buy more.

I saw that legendary "Code 1" go through but didn't acknowledge it.

Everybody knows it's rubbish, don't they?

Mr Bear, some recovery it seems now. Did a MM see your post yesterday and "design" this mornings drop?

No... that would NEVER happen. Glad you are still with us.
However, I have made a mental note to never disclose a stop/loss price in the future. Forewarned is forearmed.

Please ignore the last sentence in my previous post. It was a bit of sarcastic whimsy for a friend that carried over in my dear, beloved mouse, as is so often the case here!

Interesting there was an U/T for £15 at 9 O'clock. sensitive and don't like any negativity directed at them from other people.

"I've got a stop loss at £15 didn't think I'd be getting anywhere near that!!"

You and a few others probably taken out at that price. Good fishing for the MM's.

Nothing has changed here but the price has fallen. The company is as valuable as it was.

This is/will be a great top up opportunity or an entry for those bleating that the shares in issue should be doubled as they didn't buy shares this expensive!
Headless chickens don't think.

"Knowing my skill at trading it’ll lurch upwards the minute I do it."

Been there, done that, wrung the sweat out of the tee-shirt afterwards!

This has nothing to do with the share price, this has to do, as it does with every company, with the value of the company.

I understand your wishes and although sound from your point of view, simply has no other point of view to support it.

"I like to hold at least a 1000 or so."

Yeah, great, but who cares about that except you? The market size is 750... so buy 750, because that's what the "rules" are for Audio boom. Or buy what you can above that "at best".

One thousand, OK so... there's twenty grand. The choice is yours. Pay up, stay out or abide by their "rules.

As for them being "too expensive", I will break the habit of a life-time and quote something Tom Winnifrith said that I believe is actually good.

A team on "Show me the money" bought into a company and one of the reasons they did so was because "the shares are cheap, they are only 2p".
TW's instant and telling response was "They are NOT cheap, they cost 2p!"

Brilliant to see res. 4 and 5 defeated, and both by a stonking majority.
Some rats leaving now they aren't going to get their pockets lined at our expense, I suspect.

""This outfit has more CA's outstanding than you can shake a stick at""

Bull. I can shake a stick at an awful lot of CA's... whatever they are.

OK, so all "de-rampers" are actually honest and truthful, with more expert knowledge than everybody else, meanwhile. all "rampers" are dishonest and untruthful who know less than everybody who disagrees with them.

Good post, fits the picture at the moment, I don't suppose you'll be posting the opposite when that comes around though!

Plus..... your persecution complex is showing a little, for example,
"4) accuse people of being traders as if this is somehow illegal"
That interpretation is more opinion than fact.

I hold shares in a company that only yesterday published brilliant figures and the price fell.

It simply isn't simple. And it certainly isn't a case of, "I'm always right, you are always wrong", no matter how much that massages the ego on the occasions fits.

You don't know where this will be Friday night.

Neither do I.

"It is obviously untenable for a Chancellor to be setting tax rates that his own wife exempts herself from.
It is a question of the most basic probity & morality."

Nothing obvious about it. I for one have no problem. A man is no longer responsible for the actions of his wife. Are we still in the Dark Ages here?

""...rickshaw to Cambay for whoever the Govt official is who will remove the seal. After visiting his relatives and a stop-off at the temple etc.""

The rickshaw is now motorised, the relatives are directors of Quicky-Mart Corp and the Temple has an app.