Zib, same reason some may want to realise some value immediately, capital allocation. They'll be a r/r price based on multiple factors where the two will inevitably come together Imo.
Kalan, very good, some sense. Just to be 100% clear there will be more than enough people wanting to realise some value immediately to allow the small number of shorts to close out. If you were offered 0.1 for your shares now, hands up if you would bite their hand off
Dow, poor ascending wedge, was always a bit dubious, reverted to parallel channel...said it probably would. Now eeksy triangle looking for next move. Tending more towards 25,500 than 23,500 atm but will trade it around between the triangle until we get some clarity (or maybe I'll have a nap, cold developed into double pneumonia with hints of pleurisy and plague)
My last post on here. The small number of short positions will not be locked in. They will be sufficient distressed sellers for them to close their positions privately . GL
I was very critical of frr for the last six months and occasionally rude to some on there, let myself get wound up. I feel guilty about it for some reason. Anyway wish we'd been wrong but glad to see you back m8. All the best
You failed to answer my earlier question hence the remark. In the last few years there's been an exponential rise in blaming short positions for any fall in sp. when there are any number of more sensible explanations. Your analysis is interesting but you could possibly be a little less arrogant and sometimes your knowledge of trading mechanics is lacking a little.
The overheated atmosphere on here is disturbing. I've only ever been polite and mostly posted technical points and replied to the more mature contributors on the board, yet I'm often responded to in the manner of a toddler having a tantrum.
Anyway, I'm sure all the analysis is in your honest opinion.