The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from WS Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
As you were then add: All hot air and not a jot of substance, as I suspected. Care to answer my question, or will you continue to show the board your total lack of knowledge? Up to you my friend.
Care to guess what I do for a living? Not really into d swinging but you've taken it this way, so I'm happy to finish it.
According to bubble:
Quoting the SP as a rise from recent lows is useful information to help fellow board readers.
Quoting the SP over a different time period, highlighting the disingenuous nature of the serial rampers, is 'negative' and must be filtered. Then commented on. Every single time.
And he got upset when I said he was a hypeman for red/fort? Gosh- this is a tricky one...
If I'm filtered, poppet, there's no need to read my posts and respond each time. This isn't infant school. You're not 8. You're mummy's big boy, aren't you?
Add, before I go into detail, two questions:
1) what is your experience? Do you understand much about the sort of corporate action we need here? By way of checking I'll simply ask- what sort of takeover would you expect from, say our newest investors?
2)are you absolutely sure you want me to post realistic information on this message board that will be seen by many as a reason to close their investment for at least 8 months? I am loathed to, as I don't want to influence other PIs.
Tim
I'm not down, smick. But plenty who have listened to the rampers will be. Shame on them and their baseless hype. Insidious stuff.
35% down from 1 year ago, when red was telling everyone it was only going up.
It's all just noise. Hold until next year or the year after and get a decent payout- ignore or trade these blips, if you think you can predict these movements. As most of the rampers here have proved repeatedly, they don't know when this is going up or down! That's why most only trade fictional shares as part of their ramping role.
Talatum, you've hit the nail on the head. Nothing this side of Christmas, I'm afraid. But, all things going well, this will be subject to a TO bid in '24 or '25
Solid geology lesson from Bubble there! Do keep us updated on your latest thoughts, if your job at CERN permits.
He's right though. Solg hold lots of exploration tickets in Ecuador, and we're tiny which tells you just how under explored it is. It's a massively unexplored country with patches of very similar geography to the tastiest bits of LATAM. So there will undoubtedly be plenty of resources similar in scale to Cascabel. They won't all be found (as they haven't been concessions) or mines (because of mechanical practicalities, CapEx non-bals and local politics). Hence won't be assets.
Hope it's not a pump and dump. No sign of any news, as per - certainly the strat review isn't generating this uptick.
Not that it matters- ride these waves up and down and hold on a year or so for some corporate action. If we drop back into the teens it probably won't be forever.
BHP are not worried about Jiangxi's small stake in a small explorer, Fort. They don't spend as much time dreaming up hypothetical scenarios as you. They have a rather large mining business to attend to.
Despite what fort/red will imply (all day, every day, for years on end), no large company is going to be forced, tricked, rushed or cajoled into making an offer for solg.
One simple thought experiment to try: if any of fort's arguments hold water, wouldn't we have a TO bid from BHP by now? Alas, for many years, we haven't, which rather proves my point. Relax, wait it out, enjoy the rise. Don't believe the liars who promise an imminent sale.
Only hope they and others didn't listen to red at 35p when he was saying this was a buy and this was about to pop and this wouldn't go back into the 20s
And now he gloats at their selling. He really does like to have it all ways. In red's defence, it is much easier trading his fictional shares than other people's real ones. What was it at last count- 3m at a 9p average, right? "Firmly bid for 800k"!!!
So to conclude this particular ridiculousness, let's sum up. Bubble made a mad claim about an opening TO bid. I called it out and was told I was wrong. I then illustrated how stupid it sounded using the rampers' own favourite example to help them understand. Fort then tried to use Noront to prove bubble's now discredited figures, because he's fort and he's not the brightest. He elected not to use the actual first bid price, yet still couldn't get close to bubbles hilarious 300-400% claim.
Another standard day of LSE board madness.
A reminder that these same people have been pointing to an imminent bid for years now. Let's just enjoy the rise in SP and ignore their pathetic wishful thinking/ramping. Warren isn't the oracle. Bob doesn't control solg being sold. The sorts of deep-pocketed companies we would need to buy solg aren't bounced into decisions by small MCaps, even if we do hold a half decent asset. Patience is key. Relax.
Bonkersman- you pick a good example, but one where the company's SP needed only a ~60% rise to meet the analyst targets. I hope you'll be magnanimous enough to conceed that I'm right about the usual disconnect between opening bids and analyst targets, especially when the SP and the out-of-date targets are separated by a near 4-fold disparity?
Miketrix- my view is that solg will be sold. I just won't let fools like bubble, red or fort tell people it is imminent, which anyone who knows anything about CA can see it isn't. That's disingenuous ramping, and needs calling out. If I'm condescending, it's because there's only one direction in which to talk when speaking to thickos like bubble. I'm sure I'm not the smartest on this board, but I'm not as thick as red and his fantasy career in the city, fort and his total lack of market knowledge, or bubble and his infantile, repetitive cries for attention.
Bonkersman, with respect, do you understand what an analysts target price is? And how little correlation that has ever had to opening TO bid values? Have a dig around, it won't take you long to understand how off bubble is. He is one of the rampers that encourages others to put faith in Maxit. Pick a company Maxit has represented, and you will see. Even the irrelevant Noront that the rampers so love to hold up (because they don't understand the differences between us and them) didn't manage a 350% jump from unaffected to opening. The sort of increase bubble is spaffing over took 4 bids.
My facts will hurt his feelings, and he'll lash out about 'infestations' or whatever (lazy language best left to the 1930s...) but we all know who knows their stuff and who is a brainless hype man.
Just so nobody misses this, the ever-clever bubble is saying that he expects a several-hundred-percent premium from the current SP as an opening bid for a TO. Multiple times the current SP, which has been around for months. As an opener. Jesus wept you couldn't write his nonsense.
Don't let him forget this in a year or so when the first bid does come in. He'll still be posting one of his 4 catchphrase ramps several times a day by then, but he won't be able to bury this particular moment of stupidity. It will haunt him.
Sorry if reality sometimes bursts your bubble, bubble. You keep hyping red and fort like the good little boy you are... They'll repay you when they sell their millions of imaginary shares next week, or the week after: whenever it is they keep suggesting the company will definitely have sold by.
Honestly, they're all as stupid as the next, but they really do hate a dose of realism. Thanks for the upticks from people who have engaged the brain of an investor.
Sorry, sh4reinvest- did you have a point? Should we be worried that solg levels of investment from the Chinese are so small, when fort sees that as key to explorers succeeding in Ecuador? It's a legit question- he just doesn't want to answer because, once again, it exposes him as a deeply unintelligent ramper with little substance to support his ridiculous nonsense.
Fort- remind us how blackrock moving shares between funds keeps our SP down? You've still never explained how you were able to write something so stupid and use it to try and ramp.
Have a day off- the SP is returning to something like the value it should have maintained before Bob proved he doesn't always have the best read on the markets...
Hi fort. Not a subtle ramp today? Just a balls-out blatant one.
If we follow your logic, should we therefore be worried that BHP own twice as big a stake in solg cf. our new Chinese investors?
Wow. That's your answer? Silly sausage. You don't know me, and my views haven't given you that retort. Your right wing trump groups have taught you that's what you say when you're beaten.
You have chosen to forget that you said temperature doesn't measure anything. You then said some rubbish about average temperature, but your lack of knowledge was already plain to see.
We won't talk again, little soldier, so enjoy your rants before your next inevitable ban.
Temperament= temperature isn't
No, thicko, you said that temperament even a measure of anything. Then I drew your attention to kinetic energy, then you went quiet, then you got drunk and banned for being r***st. It's a tale as old as time.
Well done for copy/pasting from your telegram group though - we all really appreciate your lack of scientific understanding now. Leave climate to the experts, and meat eat yourself into the healthy retirement you definitely deserve.