Member Info for 15LIVES

I haven't reported your post, Eachtotheirown as it's not worthy of reporting.

And I haven't changed your wording at all. I initially referred to the accident in Sydney as an explosion, which it was. You're the one who then spoke about fires.

Many thanks for your apology, Eachtotheirown.

Not so much an irritation, but more a sense of bewilderment that someone feels the need to constantly repeat the same post.

Considering I'm mentioned then I certainly do disagree with your inaccuracy, and in a far better position than you because you're referencing me to know.

Chemical plant explosions such as the one in Sydney do not occur daily. In fact, such is the magnitude of the one yesterday, questioning whether its impact shall have a detrimental effect on Australian recycling projects currently in the pipeline is indeed a relevant one, regardless of your wife's profession.

Not really, Eachtotheirown.

I just clicked on your moniker and spent less than five seconds counting them seeing as how I get a mention.

So, even though you were told after posting it the first time that I've never had a heated debate with Red you posted it many times again. That makes you someone who spreads disinformation and brings into question the veracity of all your posts.

Oh well, each to their own, Eachtotheirown.

Do yourself a favour and post something relevant to Powerhouse (as I did this morning) whether positive, negative or indifferent.

If your struggling I'll give you a helping hand: maybe you could consider whether the explosion at a chemical recycling facility in Sydney in the past 24hrs, whilst not pyrolysis, may have a detrimental impact on fund raising down under for all aspects of environmental recycling projects.

Surely that would be better than repeating an inaccurate post which in doing so makes you feel rather superior.

That's seven times you've posted that now, Eachtotheirown.

Bit of an oddball thing to do wouldn't you say?

Transferring waste hydrocarbons into clean energy is NOT a circular economy; it's a linear one.

Think about it, Loads.

For something to be circular it has to keep going around in a circle. Pyrolysis is the best way to get rid of waste tyres and plastic etc, but its very nature relies on new plastic. So it's NOT circular.

Being linear is an argument put forward by those against pyrolysis. Neither is pyrolosis clean. Another argument put forward by those against pyrolysis.

Heated debate with 15 Lives?

I've never had a cross word with Red.

More AI bollx

Ridgewalker

I focus on shares I'm not only invested in but those I'm considering too. Hence my interest here. There's nothing sad about it and certainly no need for you to tell people who aren't invested what you did today.

Testpack

Apologies. Yes you are correct about private companies owned by public companies being required to report as PLC do. Engsolve is still a private company though, and I believe it's purpose is to enable Powerhouse management to get out financially secure out should Powerhouse fail.

Dusty

I said on previous occasions I report posts. That's why the report function is there. The moderators don't take posts down for no reason at all. Red Hornet posted a perfectly reasonable post this morning in reply to Castle's 6p claim, and you came in with an offensive post ( as you always do when Red posts). He's clearly under your skin, and has been all year. There have been many times when he hasn't even posted at all and yet you still keep posting references to him. For all you say and claim he's not under your skin and he doesn't bother you, he clearly does. See if you can go without mentioning him unless he mentions you and do us all a favour.

Ridgewalker

Yes, this is a Powerhouse board. However, it's not just for those invested. That's why posters are able to put them down as a strong sell.

It's a board for anyone interested in Powerhouse.

There are no figures because Engsolve is a private company.

It's Emmitt's lifeboat.

If Powerhouse don't sell any units then eventually it shall be wound up. If that transpires, shareholders of Powerhouse shall learn the hard and painful way that they never held shares in Engsolve.

The management are using Engsolve in a desperate attempt to get the Powerhouse share price up so they can sell their free shares and to hopefully sell a pyrolysis unit. It's happening right before your very eyes and some of you still can't see it. Emmitt is a genuine guy who has worked hard to get the technology where it now is. He's doing nothing illegal, but he is making sure that should Powerhouse fail he shall be okay financially.

Powerhouse must sell units. It's as simple as that.

DC2601

Antrim council are not working with Powerhouse on the Ballymena project.

Powerhouse have signed a L.O.I with BS Holdings within the mid and East Antrim area. Antrim council state they assist and help to drive all businesses within their area towards a net zero goal. This is totally different to them working directly with Powerhouse Energy and certainly not anywhere near to them investing tax payers money directly into a pyrolosis technology by Powerhouse unproven at a scale greater than 2.5tpd.

Patxaran

Not sure if your last line was intended or a Freudian slip.

Either way, it certainly shall be.

The likelihood of any council buying and investing in any form of technology that has not been proven at full scale is highly unlikely (and rightly so). This was the reason given only last week by Tees Valley Regeneration for them not investing in pyrolysis for their scaled requirements.

Powerhouse has only proven at 2.5tpd. It's simply no good them saying they can upscale to 40tpd and expecting others to invest on that assurance. Investors shall be wary of committing to any company that hasn't yet achieved their requirements when they can go with other manufacturers who have.

This shall also be a big sticking point for those undertaking due diligence regarding any investment in National Hydrogen. And this is why Powerhouse shall have to raise more money: to invest in and build at full scale to prove their technology at 40tpd or to invest as a joint venture with those only prepared to commit to a 40tpd unit providing risk is shared.

It's nothing like VHS and Betamax either. Whilst one of those eventually won out over the other, both were proven and out there in the market place. This is not the case at this stage with Powerhouse.

There is an outside chance that someone may place an order large enough to move the share price, and for this reason is worth keeping an eye on. But, as stated many times before, just because there is a problem that needs resolving does not necessarily mean those with the answers can put the two together.

Loadsadough

After your early morning post on the ITM board followed by their announcement this morning I think the best thing you can do with Stan's book and your share price predictions is to keep quiet.

That header should read Sleaford.

Apologies.

Bloody autocorrect.

Plans have been submitted to build a £35 million pyrolysis recycling plant at Sleaford, Lincolnshire.

Come on Emmitt. Get selling.

Today's RNS was simply an update on patents granted in the second half of this year. Good news yes, but they were granted in October. Previous granting of patents were confirmed within a few days, but for some reason these were confirmed today.

Maybe good news is being controlled in order to prepare for soon-to-be news informing of further dilution through a fundraise?

Castle

I see you're still convincing yourself that you're more successful, happy and wealthy than everyone else on this board, and in doing so feel superior to them.

I've never felt the need to be honest. Pity the bragger; follow the pleader as the saying goes.

You've spent years on here trying to impress with your apparent wealth. The fact that you do says far more about you than those to whom you refer. And all the time you've been doing so you've been losing money.

Maybe if you did some proper research it would help.

Castle

You don't live in my head. You just like to think you do. I just reply to your stupid posts that highlight your lack of education.

You don't need to give me the definitions of what plane means. I know.

I also know what a plain is you T.B.T.

I'll let you work out that acronym.

' ... on the plane.'

Lmfao!

I think you mean the plain, Castle. Not an aeroplane.

And it's in the plain.

You're not doing the reputation of your local folk much good, Castle.

No, Castle

I put my hand out and you bit it.