Member Info for 15LIVES

The only thing I can smell is yet more BS from the boy wonder. AKA, Castle.

You can write world class engineering however you wish, Castle: lower case, upper case, it makes no difference. You can have it in ten foot high neon lights or, if you prefer, made up as a banner and towed behind a low flying aircraft if it makes you feel any better. But saying it, no matter how often, doesn't make it so. Are you really stating that those companies who have been manufacturing pyrolysis units for decades and are turning a profit are looking at Powerhouse as a world class leader in their field? Because that's what world class is.

You keep peddling the lie about Powerhouse's technology being the only one that is self sufficient. Go on Huayin Group's website and check out their description of their self sufficient process. It's all there. Yet still you keep insisting only Powerhouse are self sufficient after start up.

How and why you think your family's engineering history gives you more of an insight is beyond me. My father too had his own engineering company. He was good friends with Colin Chapman who owned Lotus and with him worked on many projects, including Formula one racing team, development of the Cosworth engine and even the Lotus car in the film The Spy Who Loved Me for which my old man was thanked by Roger Moore for his efforts. But does that make me more knowledgeable on Powerhouse because of it? Nah, of course it doesn't.

So cut the BS and when you're sitting on Santa's knee this year telling him what you want, ask him for a sense of proportion and a heavy dose of reality.

There's nothing world class about Powerhouse's engineering whatsoever.

To be world class you have to be the leader in your field. Powerhouse haven't even sold one unit.

World class involves strategic thinking to bring your products to market quickly and successfully. Given it has been nearly a year since the open day and after the debacle of Protos etc, this hardly qualifies Powerhouse for world class status.

World class means that your advances in technological innovation motivates and drives competitors to challenge you as they attempt to copy and beat you. Again, this hardly qualifies Powerhouse.

Powerhouse are good, but they are not world class.

It's this misguided mindset that for so long has kept some investors here clinging to nothing more than what is in fact a fallacy. A fallacy in which they fail and refuse to see the unfolding reality.

It is, Dusty.

Except with a lower share price.

You're not in my head at all, Castle. You just wish you were.

You're really struggling with the concept of what this bulletin board is for aren't you? Maybe one day you'll accept it's for all who are interested in Powerhouse. That's why you can recommend anything from a strong sell to a strong buy.

So come on then: prove Powerhouse technology is the only one that's self sufficient after start up and if you can tell me what my lie is supposed to be.

So what's my lie then, Castle?

Go on then, Castle tell me what my lie is supposed to be.

Castle

Your usual reply highlighting your inability to prove your claims.

You're a liar. An out and out, first class, blatant, unadulterated liar.

And you know it.

Let's hope this check and clamp down on bulletin boards brings the likes of you to book.

For Christ's sake, Castle! You've been peddling this BS for years now about Powerhouse technology being the only one that's self sufficient after start up.

I told you years ago it wasn't. I gave you the names of other companies whose technology was self sufficient. I even gave you the phone number of a Chinese company so you could call them and check.

You're either the dumbest person invested here who can't do even a modicum of basic research or you're blatantly lying in order to further you're investment here.

Instead of replying with your usual clown emojis and those of tent's etc, put your glass of cheap red wine down, pull your head out of your arse and get your facts right.

Jeez you're thick.

Hi Slappy

I can only speak from having held stock in previous companies that have gone down this route. I'm certainly no expert professionally as my work life has nothing to do with this, but when previous companies I've invested in change advisors to those who specialise in raising funds then a fund raise shortly follows - which can be a good thing.

But to me this is a typical AIM klaxon call informing of further fund-raising, dilution and possible share consolidation.

Why they have taken on these new advisors we can only surmise, but to me it surely must be because the current ones who, as you say raised finance previously, aren't experienced or good enough to take the company to the next and required level.

I've said and thought since the open day that Powerhouse should be building the 40tpd units now, proving they work at that scale, but as important to have them ready for customers more or less immediately. I think we're all about to find out in the very near future whether the fund raise is going to be a welcome one regarding the share price.

Chrisstrat

Yes, you're correct: additional services. However, I still think it's most likely because BOD do not feel current advisors are the best to solely move the company forward.

These new advisors specialise in raising capital, so a fundraise is definitely coming down the track in my opinion. Let's hope it's one in which the capital raise puts Powerhouse in a position where they are less dependent on third parties acquiring fundraises themselves but more one in which allows Powerhouse to take control.

God forbid it turns out to be a fundraise just to keep the lights on whilst waiting on the likes of Avioxx and National Hydrogen.

Castle

How on earth have you interpreted a change in advisors as being an order possibly being confirmed?

Companies generally change their advisors because they are unhappy in how things are progressing and feel their current advisors are not good enough.

Divvyup

Yes let's hope so.

Apologies, I took your post as if you'd missed the RNS.

Regards.

Divvyup

Powerhouse did explain it. Two days ago.

Let's be honest about it, investors in a company who rail against 'trolls' generally mean they hate others having an opinion that differs from theirs if it is seen as negative and want it stopping.

There are posters at either end of the spectrum who post misinformation and disinformation, the latter clearly being market abuse and as such unacceptable and should be investigated. Most disagreements between posters are rooted in where it is believed the company and investments are heading. This is clearly free speech, should be recognised as such and encouraged.

God forbid that bulletin boards become a love-in, where those investors who are weak and pathetic and unable to listen to alternative viewpoints feel they need to inhabit, marvelling at each others investment prowess, comforting each other with promises and predictions of how their investments can only succeed and their soon-to-be riches.

I'm clearly a troll in some eyes, but I'm able and willing to defend anything and everything I've said as being rooted in my right to give an honest opinion on how things can pan out for Powerhouse.

Castle

I'm very positive in my life thank you very much. I'm very realistic about things too.

You seem to have an impression of me that is way off the mark, and you're talking to me as if you believe you're more successful and wealthy. It's something you've always done and done to everyone on here. I don't feel the need to go into detail about my life's successes. It's not what these boards are for, but just because I don't then don't you assume what you don't know about.

Dusty

I appreciate you putting your hands up to a poorly worded sentence.

Best of luck with your investment here.

I know I come across as negative, but for the sake of British engineering, the environment and the chance of making a couple of quid here I really would like nothing more than an RNS confirming the sale of a unit.

Dusty

I can't work out whether you're just argumentative, thick or simply slow on the uptake.

The potential here is that they may sell a unit and from that hopefully more. What else can I say when you ask me to expand on the potential here.

I've said many times that pyrolysis is the way to get rid of plastic waste and tyres etc. I've said Emmitt et al have done a good job getting the technology thus far. What I don't accept is that just because a company have the technology to a global problem doesn't mean they can put the two together. Powerhouse's survival rests too much in the hands of start up companies who are themselves fighting to raise money.

And stop twisting my words. I didn't say those who have invested were ass holes. I said the likes of you were for posting lies as you did in your 8.47 post, claiming I've said not to invest.

And I don't care one iota that you have no respect for me being here. As long as there's an RNS and the likes of Castle give me a tickle in response to it , as he did this morning, I'll reply to it if I so wish.

Dusty

I've been cautious as hell because of having been stung on AIM in the past. Something I've been open about on numerous occasions. I've also said how good a job Emmitt has done in getting the technology this far and how he seems a genuine guy.

The bottom line is my reservations about investing again these past three years have been fully justified by the share price.

Something that simply can't be gotten away from by those attacking the likes of Red and myself.

Dusty

I haven't said don't invest at all.

I've said all along that Powerhouse have potential should they happen to get out of the starting blocks with a sale. I'm just more cautious than the likes of some. And with a share price prediction these past three years to warrant it.

Today is good news. But there's more spin in the RNS to help shore up the share price than solid news of things actually happening regarding orders. If people prefer to invest now and in doing so take a greater risk with their money for a greater return then that's their choice. But there are those like myself who prefer to wait for more convincing news before investing again. That doesn't mean I think Powerhouse shall fail, and it certainly doesn't mean I wish them to fail. It just means I have to constantly defend myself against a--eholes like you whenever there's an RNS and I give my reaction to it.

If you don't like my input then filter me. And if you think I shouldn't be allowed to comment then report me to LSE.

You're reacting, Castle as if a FID has been successfully announced. Mind you, you always do overreact to RNS'.

Let's hope National Hydrogen can raise monies on favourable terms. As mentioned on previous occasions, which you are not prepared to even consider, is whether those being asked for financial assistance shall be prepared to do so if a Powerhouse Energy 40tpd unit has not been built, never mind tested.

I think the last paragraph says it all: yet again Powerhouse are in the hands of another.

Best of luck to National Hydrogen. I sincerely hope they can raise the necessary funds.