Member Info for 15LIVES

Castle

Welcome to the dark side. I've pulled up a chair for you, as Powerhouse are my number one stock for watching too.

Eight years is a long time to let go of. For what it's worth, I think you've done the right thing and are better off watching from the sidelines. Going forward, what I would suggest to you is that whatever stock you consider getting onboard with you look at it objectively, rationally and accept differing opinions openly.

We all call it wrong at times, whether the wrong share or the right share but at the wrong time.

Trading isn't for me. Never has been. Slow steady growth far better. For what it's worth I'd recommend you take a look at ITM Power. When I recommend them to you a few months ago at 34p you dismissed them, but I think you would wise looking at them again. I feel they are the next Rolls Royce over the next several years.

Best of luck with wherever you put your money.

Swazers

Do you have an answer to my question?

Swazers

Why have you dissolved your company on Tuesday of this week?

Dusty

Funding from anywhere is welcome, but until it's in the bag and orders have been placed with Powerhouse it's all just ifs buts and maybes. You don't need me to tell you the BS that comes with AIM stocks in general and how it's littered with companies that have promised the earth for shareholders whilst paying management fortunes only for companies to eventually fail.

I sincerely hope Powerhouse can get some orders, but until they do I shall question everything.

Testpack

On the NEO website I followed the links for the pre IPO investment and in order to register you have to be a sophisticated or professional investor (which I'm not) to apply under section 708 of the corporation act, which is a maximum of 20 investors raising a maximum of $2m within a twelve month period.

So it naturally begs the question how much is actually going to be raised and through how many investors. If it's $2m and NEO split that equally between their 15 holding companies then....

This raise is not subjected to full disclosure, and on the back of United Hydrogen's name change implies they have been forced to try this approach as the previous one failed. For the sake of the environment, British manufacturing and the potential to turn a profit as a potential investor, I hope NEO can raise some decent money and feed it through to Powerhouse, but with this being AIM I can't help but question the transparency of what's going on, especially when those running National Hydrogen ( not NEO) are unknown. I mean, why don't they disclose who's behind and running these 15 companies, because the NEO management are certainly not on a daily basis.

Why the secrecy for God's sake?

When I e mailed United Hydrogen earlier in the year to ask, they replied that they were not allowed to discuss National Hydrogen.

Is it any wonder people are sceptical and question everything.

Hi Testpack

Always good to get your measured feedback.

Yes, certainly good news today.

My only reservation is whether financial close for NH2 is dependent upon a successful IPO later this year, especially as that is being undertaken via section 708 of the financial act in Australia and their 2/20/12 rule.

Dusty

I agree.

Many thanks.

Dusty

Nothing wrong with asking Swazers if he thinks $2,000,000 from the IPO is enough for NEO to undertake what he highlighted.

Swazers

Do you consider $2,000,000 enough for NEO to do all that you reference?

That's if the IPO is successful this time?

Swazers

I was one of the March 2021 crowd.

Let's hope for it again.

Unlike you to be bored to death, Swazers.

What you really mean is you don't know how to handle my last post with you having had me down as a troll all of this time.

I have offered before, if you would like me to come and work for you I can. I can help keep your company sharp and call the share price correctly. When I say you, I of course mean you and those people you referred to as 'us' in your 16:41 post.

Swazers

I mentioned United Hydrogen's name change and IPO as I saw it as a positive. I've said all along that should Powerhouse sell a unit or if United Hydrogen successfully complete an IPO then I shall buy some shares.

You're totally fixated with me being a troll, that even when I reference something positive you can't see it.

I've been sharp with this share for the past few years, totally calling the share price correctly over that time.

Now that is a fact.

Swazers

Let's be even more clear.

The board was informed yesterday of United Hydrogen's name change and intended IPO listing and three hours later you referenced it. That was me staying sharp.

You've asked where you're going wrong with your posts.

Besides the obvious of calling the share price wrong for the past few years, I can enlighten you should you wish.

Swazers

It was one of your so-called troll army who brought to your attention United Hydrogen's change of name and intended IPO on the ASX in Q4 this year.

And they did so in a post that was their first in over a month.

Hardly the postings of someone belonging to a troll army.

United Hydrogen name change to New Energy Opportunities Limited and planned IPO on ASX Q4 2025.

I've never shorted a share in my life. I wouldn't know how to go about it, Swazers.

There's lots of positive news to do with Powerhouse. I've said so many times. However, I do feel that you read way too much into the positive news and take things as a given when they have not yet materialised to the extent that is hoped. I respect your opinion, but your trouble is that you just can't accept someone else can be interested in the same company and in doing so not have such an unwavering belief as yourself.

If Red Hornet has been here longer than you, Swazers and he has posted fewer posts then surely out the two of you you're more prolific.

You keep going on about anonymous posters. We're all bloody anonymous. That's the whole point of the board. If annonaminity bothers you that much, then post your full name, address and contact number on here.

I would, but I have to be careful. With my track record at predicting the share price if I was to give out my address I could draw the curtains back one day and it could be like a scene from The Life of Brian and you all start following me around.

Swazers (aka TheOne)

I'm not even remotely rattled.

Why would I be?

Nothing anyone says on here effects the share price one iota. I have no shares in a company I'm following because they have potential should they manage to get their product to market. Whilst merely following them for the past 18 months, having got out with a profit, the share price has fallen.

So why on earth would I be rattled!

Your identical grammar and use of certain punctuation between your two accounts stuck out like a sore thumb.

Quite frankly, it was an insult to everyone's intelligence on here, irrespective of their viewpoint.

Swazers

Are you talking to yourself there?

Your use and TheOne's use of the en dash and the em dash in both your posts clearly points to you having set up another account.

Swazers

Wouldn't you be better off giving your attention to updating your confirmation statement with the relevant authorities?

You have an active proposal to strike you off which was served you on 15th April. You have two months from its date otherwise your company property becomes bona vacantia and the property of the crown.

You mention how posters on here hide behind keyboards. Just wondered if any of us are near to you at number 11, BL1 1PZ it would be okay for us to pop in and introduce ourselves and in doing so hopefully prove we are not actors.