Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
I think a fair price would be in the range of 160-180.
“Radio Men Do It With Frequency” :)
fleccy. Are you serious? I can't take another 2 years of whinging & moaning, perhaps I should just end it all,& join the revshep?
Hello divhunter. Can you do me a favour & show all your costs including dealing costs & stamp duty, to show you are making a profit, because I don't get it unless you are just lucky. Thanks. I wouldn't say selling vod is a mugs game, but I think reducing & adding is, if you take into account the costs? In the long run,unless you are a professional investor,you will probably lose. Thanks divhunter, awaiting your reply?
moneyboy, I have noted your guess and will display it tomorrow, good luck, and i think most of us are thinking 140-150 by may or even a lot sooner, just a guess of course, lets hope it can keep climbing the ladders, but you know the crazy world we are living in right now ?
Evening Team, well VOD is becoming so interesting, are we going higher or is it time to bail out??????
My guess is we are going to go higher, my end of week SP guess tomorrow is: £1.36
Have a go
Well I've sold a few today & I don't consider myself a mug. Having sold a few PFC at 151p to increase my holding here recently I've now returned the favour here to buy back in to PFC at 117. With no excess capital outlay I'm now the proud owner of 102 more VOD shares & 366 more PFC shares than I was earlier this year. That'll do me & if they keep on moving in opposite directions I'll continue to reduce & add accordingly whilst keeping a core hiding in both. Be interesting to see which has more upside in the next few weeks, could go either way. JUP by the way has been a bit of a disappointment so far since I got in at 260p, might have to do some trading there.
Just dont look at google - its about time they got their prices correct !!!
Yeah, thanks robleo. Fantastic week. I looked at the google price about 30mins ago & the graph showed a plummet, so I was well pleased when I saw the actual finish up 1.26. My top up shares are doing very well,but shame about the other one's, but the divi is good though , & I promise I want top up again, well not for a while anyway.? But hoping for a 1.37 finish of course tomorrow.
Good evening Dan, you must be well happy this week with the sp holding up, and so am I. well who's going to be closest at close tomorrow, it was robleo 130, dan 131, Mikey 137 (heart), hope Mikey is the winner, lets hope we don't have a bad day, will be great to have a good Friday finish
GOOD LUCK ALL
Not a bad finish compared to the markets
Watching the dow and us tech 100 bomb atm as the rotation from tech to value dividend payers goes on apace - anyone who is selling or has sold VOD over the last 24 hours is a mug - two upgrades today from brokers who agree with me by the looks of it - 140p is on the cards here and pdq too
gla dyor etc
Well for myself at my average SP, the SP rise is keeping ahead of inflation for my origonal investment, which means the nice dividend is free cash to invest.
I see no reason at this time why selling makes sense.
The two telecoms stocks I hold give me access to different geographical markets in slightly different ways. If I sold either I don't see a better telecoms stock to replace them with.
Mining, Utilities, Banks, Oil, Alternative energy, Pharma, Insurance and Telecoms, are all areas I like to hold at least two stocks.
"I am not selling"
Neither am I. £2 plus in the next couple of years, imo.
I am not selling...
"Good luck to all you who will retain their holdings. We are getting out.
every blessing
Rev Shep"
"Look straight ahead, and fix your eyes on what lies before you. Mark out a straight path for your feet." Goodbye and God bless.
Well enough of this nonsense, so back to the vodafone sp. A good day so far, let's all hope for a good finish?
Both myself and parishioners have held VOD for a number of years, and had to average down a lot in that time. We are now at a point where we are a little in front and will sell after the dividend tomorrow. The market seems to think that there is a lot of upside potential in the shares. We disagree. IOO they will not be taken over because of their excessive borrowings. Any large deal may be met and refused by the regulators. The balance sheet is woeful. It is full of goodwill caused by previous CEOs (who got knighthoods) who paid way too much for assets. It has a current ratio (current asstes/current liabilities) of about 0.3. We think that it should now be regarded as an income stock, although it may have done better to pay less dividends and reduce borrowings. Good luck to all you who will retain their holdings. We are getting out.
every blessing
Rev Shep
Well the answer is no. But it was Ackers who asked a question, so what has that got to do with me? I also think you will find the vast majority of my posts don't mention you at all, & the ones that do, are usually critical! So sorry to disappoint you, but no crush!
Nope -rediculous comment you are the one that keeps mentioning me so ask yourself the same question
Mikey. That is the 2nd time you have made that comment, so are you gay? Coming out of the closet?
'In arid climates, like Africa, with clear sky's, rain fade probably wouldn't be a big issue, but the UK's a different matter '
I remember leaves on trees and the roaming bills increasing 20% in the growth season LoL
'thats my div reinvested'
Payment date 4 February = 3.75826p. Good week so far!
Theloaf, well good luck, hope it starts climbing for you
"I also wonder if the carrier capacity between a large rural cell is comparable with a satellite. A bit like comparing a B road with the M25. Must be a profit curve moving from urban wifi to rural cell v satellite. Interesting now I am thinking about it"
My experience was in line of sight terrestrial links at 10Ghz, 13Ghz, 23Ghz, and 50Ghz. 10 and 13Ghz had good rain fade characteristics, 23Ghz not so good, and 50Ghz was only used for short range communication up to a couple of miles. The customer facing radios were low power, around 20dbm (100mw), with higher power 10/13 Ghz backhaul radio using travelling wave tubes to amplify to over a Watt, ensuring reliable transmission for higher bandwidths in bad weather. The required gain is achieved using amplifiers and directional antenna's (Dish's)
The technology has moved on a lot, by the look of things, with mobile cells using phased array antenna's (MIMO) and 5G Massive MIMO, to service many users giving the best compromise gain in multiple directions on different channels. Also to cram data into the available bandwidths, they use a technique called QAM, which uses phase changes to modulate the carrier wave; The higher the QAM rate, the higher the bandwidth, with more power and better conditions required to transmit and recieve reliably.
I think the idea with Starlink is to have multiple satellites, with the customer dish selecting the best line of site signal available to particular satellites, but if it's hammering down, the rain fade attenuation will severly attenuate the signal in all directions, even overhead. The problems get worse as you move up the mm Wave band, so the lower the frequency, the less the atmospheric problems. The Earth station uplink/downlinks will have much higher bandwidth requirements than customer terminals, as they will carry the aggregated data, with much higher powers and big dishes. I suppose time will tell how LEO's perform in bad weather, and what sort of reputation they'll get. In arid climates, like Africa, with clear sky's, rain fade probably wouldn't be a big issue, but the UK's a different matter lol.