We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Ibug
Read what it says or cant you read.
1. Storage of crude oil
HHDL currently hold a standard rules permit sr2015 no2 EPR/SP3339YS
The proposed operations will require the existing well site to be extended and the storage of oil containers to be relocated to the east of the site.
Due to this change,theoperating condition for SR2015 can no longer be met, in particular the distance from a water course and THE LIMIT OF 500 TONNES STORAGE CAPACITY.
Ibug has got it wrong again.
They hold a permit SR2015 and that has a max storage limit of 500 tonnes of oil. That is approx the amount of storage now on site after the new tanks went in the other week.
All fully approved.
The New EA application is for new works required for HH3 -4-5-6 and work to the East of the site.
Greenfish
New EA application is for 7 x 1300 barrel tanks which give total storage of 9100 barrels. More than adequate for current needs imo.
https://consult.environment-agency.gov.uk/psc/rh6-0hn-horse-hill-developments-ltd/supporting_documents/04%20%20Site%20Location%20Plan%20and%20Site%20Layout%20Plan.pdf
Zoom in on page 8 for proof.
Pboo
That is the permit that is being considered at the moment. The consultation period is closed and the EA have not yet reached a decision.
Show me where they have issued it. If you can't understand that this is the current permit I would give up investing in shares. It will be updated when a new version has been issued.
https://environment.data.gov.uk/public-register/industrial-installations/registration/SP3339YS?__pageState=result-all
Ibug
https://twitter.com/WealdOilers/status/1206522044659195904?s=19
So that's 5 days storage if the one well produces 666 barrels of oil day roughly 3x current levels. They will need more for more wells
Apparently it's 7 barrels of oil to a ton
Pboo
an you provide link?
"ukog have EA permission to store 500 tonnes of oil on site which is more than enough for HH1 and HH2Z." I doubt it.
PbooCan you provide link to w
Suggest you check the last EA permit application which was for 1540 barrels of oil permitted storage.
You can get the approval document from here.
https://environment.data.gov.uk/public-register/industrial-installations/registration/SP3339YS?__pageState=result-all
You will also find the details in here: Title: Environmental Method Statement Document Number: HH-PR-Q08 Rev. 4 Rev. Date: 09/12/16
Scallywag. I did a sample and found 2-1 in favour.
ibug, I read a sample few and found that both for and against didn't meet the criteria.
Ibug
No up lift is required as yet, ukog have EA permission to store 500 tonnes of oil on site which is more than enough for HH1 and HH2Z.
The new EA applications for the additional storage 500 tonnes + is to the East of the site when we drill HH3 -4 -5 -6
So we are not waiting EA approval for the additional storage tanks that we saw being delivered to the site and connected up 2 weeks ago
I’ve just looked at the first page of responses and it’s all pretty much about fracking and earthquakes......these people are either uninformed, not very bright or just hoping that if they say something enough times it might come true.
I would like to assume that the body that issues the EA permits has a better understanding of the situation at Horsehill of whats actually going on.
scallywag3
Is that for those supporting or opposing?
environmental permit consultation Closed 25 Nov 2019. I could have gone through it in 5 minutes, albeit I'd need the trash can within 2 feet of me.
https://consult.environment-agency.gov.uk/psc/rh6-0hn-horse-hill-developments-ltd/consultation/published_select_respondent?sort=submitted&order=descending
At least 431 responses to view before an updated EA permit can be issued for storage uplift.
https://environment.data.gov.uk/public-register/industrial-installations/registration/SP3339YS?__pageState=result-all
Perhaps they are waiting for the Christmas tree to be delivered to switch on the lights all at the same time?