Latest Share Chat

REMOVE ADS

Tertiary Minerals Share Chat (TYM)

Tertiary Minerals Information

Share Price Information for Tertiary Minerals (TYM)

Share Price is delayed by 15 minutes

Get Live Data

0.08 0.00 (0.00%)

Bid:

0.075

Ask:

0.085

Spread: 0.01 (13.333%)

Market Cap: £4.12m

Last checked at -

Intraday Tertiary Minerals Share Chart

REMOVE ADS

Some Videos You Might Like

Wishbone Gold announce 2025...

17th March 2026

Wishbone Gold

Wishbone Gold: Proposed Acq...

9th April 2026

Wishbone Gold

What's Hot 14th April 2026

14th April 2026

Wishbone Gold

Chat Filters

You must be logged in to use filters Click here to login

Post Message

Post a Message

You must be logged in to post Click here to login

London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".

By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:

You will only have one login account. Registering with multiple accounts is not allowed. Any user found to have more than one account on this site will have all, and any future accounts suspended permanently.
Your email and password must only be used by you. If a post is made under your account, it will be considered that it was posted by yourself.
Your account nickname must not be the same, or contain, listed company names or board members' names.
While debating and discussion is fine, we will not tolerate; rudeness, swearing, insulting posts, personal attacks, or posts which are invasive of another's privacy.
You will not;
- discuss illegal or criminal activities.
- post any confidential or price sensitive information or that is not public knowledge.
- post misleading or false statements regarding the share price and performance. Such posts are deemed as market abuse, and may be reported to the appropriate authorities.
- post any private communication, or part thereof, from any other person, including from a member of the board of directors of a listed company. Such posts cannot be verified as true and could be deemed to be misleading.
- post any personal details (e.g. email address or phone number).
- post live price or level 2 updates.
- publish content that is not your original work, or infringes the copyright or other rights of any third party.
- post non-constructive, meaningless, one word (or short) non-sense posts.
- post links to, or otherwise publish any content containing any form of advertising, promotion for goods and services, spam, or other unsolicited communication.
- post any affiliate or referral links, or post anything asking for a referral.
- post or otherwise publish any content unrelated to the board or the board's topic.
- re-post premium share chat posts on regular share chat.
- restrict or inhibit any other user from using the boards.
- impersonate any person or entity, including any of our employees or representatives.
- post or transmit any content that contains software viruses, files or code designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the functionality of this website or any computer software or equipment.
- If you are going to post non-English, please also post an English translation of your post.
If you are going to post non-English, please also post an English translation of your post.

The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.

Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.

It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.

Premium and Verified Members

Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.

London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.

Only showing the five most recent posts. Click here to view the whole thread.

REMOVE ADS

Only showing the five most recent posts. Click here to view the whole thread.

I'm very happy with the plans for Mushima North over the next few months.

We already have multiple holes which ended in mineralisation furthermore we have extension prospects in both the North-West and South-West directions.

My calculations do not include any assumptions that either depth extensions or the extensions to NW and SW have been factored into the exploration target.

I believe the target is based only on what we have drilled so far and that it doesn't include any assumptions about areas believed to offer continuations of the mineralisation not yet drilled.

There is evidently a fault which runs SW-NE which would appear to be a significant structure and we have another area of interest to the South adjacent to West of the fault which may be a continuation of the SW/ NW extension. These extensions (SW/ NW and depth) and the possible continuation offer the scope to double or triple what we have and all in what appears to be an oxidised zone.

The plan is 2000-3000 of largely infill drilling but one hopes that we also get some step out into other parts of what is anticipated as a continuation of the oxidised zones.

Once this infill campaign is done we'll be in a very strong position.

The mineralisation is shown to be consistent and the geometry is flat tabular and near surface and the oxidised characteristics suggest easy low cost recovery.

My guess is that although we could radically expand and upscale exploration by fully exploring the extensions and depth plus the sulfide zone and adjacent targets instead we are going to define what is likely to be an economic resource based on the infill of our previous campaigns.

This is an approached championed by Pierre Lassonde and others whereby you don't try to define all the resource but instead focus on defining enough to build a mine and then use the revenues of the mine to further develop your asset.

My prediction based on the grade consistency so far is that we are going to witness 2000-3000 meters of bountiful reports followed by a company defining maiden resource.

This infill drilling into an area already shown to be characterized by very consistent and wide zones of mineralisation is as close to shooting rats in a barrel as it gets in exploration drilling.

Given the simple nature of the geometry and consistency of mineralisation followers here will be whacking the drill reports into their AI's and we'll all have the Jorc number estimated to a reasonable level of accuracy way before the official one is released.

Once we have the Jorc we'll be in a very strong position to negotiate a JV to fully develop the asset.

We still have to prove the metallurgy and the drill can and sometimes does disappoint and we may need to raise however even when we do raise I'm still confident that this can be done within the context of a disciplined and controlled expansion of the asset value.

DYOR/ GLA

Only showing the five most recent posts. Click here to view the whole thread.

tertiary’s mushima north a1 target is an interesting early‑stage discovery with scale potential, but it is still very high risk and many steps away from demonstrating real economic value for equity investors.

the a1 exploration target is 15–30 mt at 40–60 g/t ageq, implying an upper conceptual end of ~58 moz ageq in situ.

mineralisation is a flat‑lying, near‑surface oxide/supergene tabular body, roughly 500 m x 300 m and up to 75 m thick, open to the northwest, southwest and at depth.

it is polymetallic: silver, copper and zinc (plus accessory critical metals in places), but the economics are framed around a silver‑equivalent grade.

metallurgy is a complete unknown: no testwork has been done; ageq assumes full recoveries and uses aggressive metal prices (ag 75 usd/oz, cu 5.8 usd/lb, zn 1.45 usd/lb), which may overstate the economic significance of the quoted grades.

the system is currently interpreted as secondary supergene enrichment with an undefined primary source: if the feeder zone at depth is not economically mineralised, the oxide blanket may have limited tonnage/grade the exploration target is an estimation of this.

the system is open in multiple directions and at depth, and there are several other untested geochemical/geophysical targets (a2, b1–b3, c2) within a 12 km radius, giving regional upside if the model is proved.

the project is in a known iocg/sed‑hosted cu‑ag district, 20–28 km from the historic, high‑grade kalengwa mine (11% cu ore historically), which is under re‑development and expected to produce ~15 kt cu per year, indicating an established mining corridor and precedent infrastructure/permitting path.

drilling density is still reconnaissance level; the “****geneity” and continuity assumed in the block model could deteriorate with tighter spacing, reducing tonnes/grade relative to the current conceptual envelope.

if both infill drilling and metallurgy are clearly positive a1 becomes a legitimate development‑stage asset with a defined oxide ag‑cu‑zn resource and a line of sight to scoping study economics.

the equity case shifts from “maybe there is something here” to “there is definitely a resource here; the key question is how big and how economic.”

mushima north is potentially a material discovery for a small aim explorer, giving genuine optionality if a 20–30 mt oxide resource at robust ageq grade can be defined and metallurgically proven.

my guess is that we stay under the radar for a little longer.

once they start reporting on the first few drills we'll have an idea of the continuity quite quickly. the drilling to date has already shown good levels of continuity- the infill will just close the gaps and boost certainty to a levels required to begin resource definition.

i'm not sure the market cares that much right now but it seems that the boss is pretty keen judging by his interview. interesting times.

i look forward to the first drill results.

gla/ dyor