RE: Swedish Government8 Apr 2026 15:20
Would agree Treestump. I would love the company to go all in on Mushima North. Why can't we put another £100k into a sampling and aircore campaign at Target A2/B/C to discover something similar to A1? The value creation through such minimal spending is so assymetric I don't understand why we're not pursuing this alongside A1 infill drilling. Maybe we are but if so, it needs to be RNSed as I've not seen active comms on the other Mushima targets.
The next question is where did the near-surface mineralisation at A1 come from? If they think there's a porphyry/sulphide body below can we get some IP run over the license.